[BUG] Invalid search bound (wrong side of point) [9.7.11 (release_9.7.11 @ d:/Programs/emacs-30.1/share/emacs/30.1/lisp/org/)]

Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See https://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback Your bug report will be posted to the Org mailing list. -

Re: ox-html Incorrectly (?) Puts HTML Into the `` Tag

Hello, I found [this] discussion while trying to strip `org` format markers from the `title` tag during `HTML` export. Is there still interest in this idea? If so, I can submit a patch. [this] On 2021-

Re: Documentation bug in "(org) The open-source protocol"

Charles Choi writes: > Extraneous '&' character in JavaScript bookmark, fragment "open-source?&" > should be changed to "open-source?". > > https://orgmode.org/manual/The-open_002dsource-protocol.html Fixed, thanks. -- Bastien

Re: [PATCH v5] WORG Org Protocol Page Rewrite

On 24/06/2025 04:40, Christian Moe wrote: Charles Choi writes: Patch v5 (fbed0861) of org-protocol.org rewrite. Thanks! Applied now. (The build should happen in a few hours.) Thank you, Christian. Charles, do you plan further changes of org-protocol.org? Are you

[BUG] Exporting an org buffer from the source editor breaks editing

Hey everyone, After exporting an `org` buffer in the editor of a source block, I find that `org-edit-special` stops working in some places. To reproduce: 1. `emacs -Q`, 2. `M-x org-mode`, 3. Replace the scratch buffer with the following contents: --8<---cut here---start--

Re: [PATCH v5] WORG Org Protocol Page Rewrite

> On Jun 24, 2025, at 4:00 AM, Max Nikulin wrote: > > Charles, do you plan further changes of org-protocol.org? Are you interested > in discussion of its modifications? - Although I claim no monopoly ownership of org-protocol.org, there are still parts of it that I think still need updating

Re: Pending contents in org documents

Hi Ihor, Ihor Radchenko writes: > Hi Bruno, > > It has been a while since I last heard from you. > May I know if you need any further help with the branch? Sorry. Yes, I'm still planning to answer your last comments and get it done. Some other tasks just got more priority. I'll have to upd