On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Sebastien Vauban
wrote:
> Then, I can provide a patch with `time-stamp' function added to
> `before-save-hook' in Org mode.
I would lobby against this being the default template, as these time
stamps really mess up the ability to merge org files from multiple
bran
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
> lbml...@hethcote.com writes:
>
>> How do you archive old instances of repeating todos, C-c C-x C-s archives
>> the whole thing. I'd like to have something that would take the following:
>>
>> ** TODO Mutter an oath
>>DEADLINE: <2012-02-13
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Olaf Meeuwissen writes:
>> If running `make check` (or similar) creates these files, `make clean`
>> (or similar) should clean them up.
>
> I was asking that question to decide whether I do need to extend my
> Makefile fork to handle the clea
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Sam Auciello wrote:
> I'm trying to set up repeating events to stop repeating after a given date.
> In this case it's classes I'm taking this semester that need to repeat once
> a week so I enter them like:
>
> *** Programming Workshop
> <2012-01-24 Tue 13:30
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> I've added org-element.el in contrib directory. It is a complete parser
> and interpreter for Org syntax.
>
> While it was written to be extensible, it is also an attempt to
> normalize current syntax and provide guidance for its evolution
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Carsten Dominik
wrote:
> How about changing the make file so that the dependence is on the Org file,
> not on the source file?
> You could then arrange for make to call emacs in batch-mode to tangle the
> source file and then compile it?
The original question w
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Tom Prince wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:23:18 -0600, Brian Wightman
> wrote:
>> Perhaps a way to deal with this would be to tangle to a different
>> directory, and then sync any changes into your compilation source
>> directory.
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Holger Hoefling wrote:
> I have a problem/request for org-mode and was looking for help. I am using
> org-mode to write source code files and tangle them out. I want to compile
> them using make. My problem now is that org-mode overwrites the old files
> every time
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Eric Schulte wrote:
> This is also after all the development repository, and while I do try
> very hard never to break this head of this repository at the same time I
> think it is an acceptable place to try out new functionality.
Given that a common recommendatio
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Sebastien Vauban
wrote:
> For my information, why do you need to test that 2 suites don't run at the
> same time? They only write to temp buffers, no? Can they conflict?
If they do conflict and only one set of tests should run at a time,
shouldn't the second set
(and (your-sexp-here) (not (except-dates-here)))
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Karl Voit wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am into a process to write a convert tool from my old calendar
> software[1] to Org-mode.
>
> Now I do have to define something like »this event is recurring each
> week on Wednesday ex
Neglected forwarding to the list - sorry Eric for the double post.
Brian
-- Forwarded message --
From: Brian Wightman
Date: Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: [O] [test] Mark tests with missing dependencies as
"expected to fail"
To: Eric Schulte
On Tue, Oc
Never mind - lack of coffee.
- Original Message
From: MidLifeXis at PerlMonks
To: Robert Inder
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Sent: Tue, April 19, 2011 10:40:18 AM
Subject: Re: [O] How can I review a day?
#+BEGIN: clocktable :block today :scope agenda :maxlevel 4 :link 2
#+END: clocktab
13 matches
Mail list logo
