Thanks for the report, I have fixed this. Please find the modified
version at
http://www.astro.uva.nl/~dominik/Tools/org/noutline.el
- Carsten
On Jun 22, 2006, at 17:35, Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
Problem with XEMACS noutline mode. This backtrace happens when i try
and cycle from OVERVIEW.
Deb
Problem with XEMACS noutline mode. This backtrace happens when i try
and cycle from OVERVIEW.
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-variable set-extent-endpoints)
(if (> (extent-end-position ex) end) (progn (set-extent-endpoints ... ...
beg) (set-extent-endpoints ex end ...)) set-extent-endpoint
I just found file-remote-p, which may be the right solution.
- Carsten
On Jun 20, 2006, at 19:29, Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 07:13:17PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
Maybe I should force efs/tramp file names to be opened with Emacs/.
What is the best and most general way
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 07:13:17PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> Maybe I should force efs/tramp file names to be opened with Emacs/.
>
> What is the best and most general way to test if a file name is efs
> or tramp or ange-ftp?
>
For tramp you'll need to RTM, but for efs its /[EMAIL PROTECTE
Maybe I should force efs/tramp file names to be opened with Emacs/.
What is the best and most general way to test if a file name is efs or
tramp or ange-ftp?
- Carsten
On Jun 20, 2006, at 18:53, Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 06:36:19PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
Maybe y
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 06:36:19PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> Maybe you are not trying to open the file in emacs?
> Following a link picks an application to open the file, depending on
> the extension. Under windows, the default is to use "open" for
> files, which is just like double-clicki
Maybe you are not trying to open the file in emacs?
Following a link picks an application to open the file, depending on
the extension. Under windows, the default is to use "open" for files,
which is just like double-clicking them. However, "open" may choke on
an efs path.
You can force the
On Jun 20, 2006, at 17:11, Carsten Dominik wrote:
Yes, looks like this function does not do at all what I think it
should be doing. I'll remove the call, thanks for tracking this down.
Correction: ...what I *thought* it was doing. The function is fine, I
was wrong putting the call there..
Yes, looks like this function does not do at all what I think it should
be doing. I'll remove the call, thanks for tracking this down.
- Carsten
On Jun 20, 2006, at 17:03, Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 03:47:13PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
Hi Tim,
On Jun 20, 2006, at 1
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 03:47:13PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
>
> On Jun 20, 2006, at 14:09, Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
> >
> >Also ":" needed to be added to org-link-escape-chars, as below:
> >(defconst org-link-escape-chars '((":" . ":") ("[" . "%5B") ("]" .
> >"%5D") (" " . "%20"))
Hi Tim,
On Jun 20, 2006, at 14:09, Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
Also ":" needed to be added to org-link-escape-chars, as below:
(defconst org-link-escape-chars '((":" . ":") ("[" . "%5B") ("]" .
"%5D") (" " . "%20"))
"Association list of escapes for some characters problematic in
links.")
Is t
I experimented with automating the noutline usage with a patch for org-install:
(if (featurep 'xemacs)
(progn (setq dir (expand-file-name (concat default-directory "xemacs")))
(if (file-directory-p dir)
(setq load-path (cons dir load-path)))
)
)
The prob
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 07:38:03PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> On Jun 15, 2006, at 15:21, Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
> >
> >Could you just add it into a 'contrib' type directory in the
> >distribution file?
>
> Yes, I will distribute the file with Org-mode, but in an XEmacs
> directory, not in
On Jun 15, 2006, at 15:21, Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
Could you just add it into a 'contrib' type directory in the
distribution file?
Yes, I will distribute the file with Org-mode, but in an XEmacs
directory, not in contrib. If I put it in contrib, too many people
will install it also under Em
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 06:54:13PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> If you are using XEmacs to run org-mode, the following is important
> for you:
>
> Starting with the next release of Org-mode (4.38, only a few days
> away), Org-mode will require the use of noutline.el, a new
> implementatio
If you are using XEmacs to run org-mode, the following is important for
you:
Starting with the next release of Org-mode (4.38, only a few days
away), Org-mode will require the use of noutline.el, a new
implementation of outline mode on which Org-mode is based. This new
implementation uses
16 matches
Mail list logo
