Ihor Radchenko writes:
> It has been two months since the last message here.
Closing due to inactivity.
Canceled.
"Closing" does not mean that this feature will not be accepted. I am
just removing it from the list of tracked tasks that require maintainer
attention.
--
Ihor Radchenko //
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Andrea Lazzarini writes:
>
>> I was busy with work and had less time to focus on this, sorry!
>
> No problem. Just wanted to make sure that this thread did not fall
> through the cracks.
It has been two months since the last message here.
If you encounter any
Andrea Lazzarini writes:
> I was busy with work and had less time to focus on this, sorry!
No problem. Just wanted to make sure that this thread did not fall
through the cracks.
> Well, sorry for the noob question but how do you suggest I fork the org.el
> file to start tinkering with it?
> I
> Il giorno 2 lug 2023, alle ore 12:56, Ihor Radchenko ha
> scritto:
>
> Hello,
>
> It has been over one month since the last message in this thread.
> Are you still interested to work on this feature? Do you need any help?
Hi,
I was busy with work and had less time to focus on this,
Andrea Lazzarini writes:
> I've tried to use org-edit-special with a src block with 2+ blank lines and
> the second #+end_src is not seen as part of the footnote.
> Is this the edge problem you were addressing? I get the same result with the
> indirect buffer.
Yup, it is one of the edge
Il giorno 24 mag 2023, alle ore 11:03, Ihor Radchenko ha
scritto:
>
> Payas Relekar writes:
>
>> I've been playing with org-footnote-assistance, and this is again just
>> another opinion, but I'm also preferring the indirect buffer. It just
>> puts things in better perspective.
>
> I'd
Andrea Lazzarini writes:
> I now wonder if there is a way to prevent changing
> eldoc-echo-area-use-multiline-p
> to nil globally to prevent footnotes from appearing there and not only in the
> eldoc-doc-buffer.
See the docstring for `eldoc-documentation-functions' - you can call the
CALLBACK
Payas Relekar writes:
> I've been playing with org-footnote-assistance, and this is again just
> another opinion, but I'm also preferring the indirect buffer. It just
> puts things in better perspective.
I'd prefer to integrate things with `org-edit-special', if possible.
Possibly extending
Andrea Lazzarini writes:
> I've fiddled with org-edit-special and I see it has a major flaw, at least in
> my opinion.
> It inserts all changes without keeping track of the undos, as opposed to the
> indirect
> buffer solution, which also had the advantage of doing everything from a
> single
> Il giorno 22 mag 2023, alle ore 17:30, Ihor Radchenko
> ha scritto:
>
> Andrea Lazzarini writes:
>
>> Eldoc (or tooltips) could be great for previewing: I'm going to give them a
>> try
>> and to see how they might be integrated in an academic writing workflow.
>> I wander if they would
Andrea Lazzarini writes:
> Eldoc (or tooltips) could be great for previewing: I'm going to give them a
> try
> and to see how they might be integrated in an academic writing workflow.
> I wander if they would maintain buffer-specific highlighting though...
AFAIK, Eldoc expects a function that
> Il giorno 22 mag 2023, alle ore 13:45, Ihor Radchenko
> ha scritto:
>
> Andrea Lazzarini writes:
>
>> I am writing to you because I have recently published a simple package called
>> org-footnote-assistant
>> [https://github.com/lazzalazza/org-footnote-assistant],
>> which aims at
Andrea Lazzarini writes:
> I am writing to you because I have recently published a simple package called
> org-footnote-assistant [https://github.com/lazzalazza/org-footnote-assistant],
> which aims at improving the overall functionality and user experience of
> footnotes
> within Org Mode.
I am writing to you because I have recently published a simple package called
org-footnote-assistant [https://github.com/lazzalazza/org-footnote-assistant],
which aims at improving the overall functionality and user experience of
footnotes
within Org Mode.
The current management of footnotes has
14 matches
Mail list logo
