Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

On Fri, 15-04-2016, at 23:49, Adam Porter wrote: > Ramon Diaz-Uriarte writes: > >> Faster? How did you do that? For me it is slower, noticeably (I estimate no >> less than 3 to 4 times; from less than one second to about two or more >> seconds in many

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

On Sat, 16-04-2016, at 03:44, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > Ramon Diaz-Uriarte writes: > >> On Thu, 14-04-2016, at 09:07, Eric Abrahamsen >> wrote: (...) Eric, do you mean the dlbsnail and S3.dlbsnail? Or do you mean

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

Ramon Diaz-Uriarte writes: > On Thu, 14-04-2016, at 09:07, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: >>> (...) >>> Eric, do you mean the dlbsnail and S3.dlbsnail? Or do you mean the >>> "LinkDownloads"? The last one I've not been able to get to work (seems to >>> do

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

Ramon Diaz-Uriarte writes: > Faster? How did you do that? For me it is slower, noticeably (I estimate no > less than 3 to 4 times; from less than one second to about two or more > seconds in many simple tasks such as opening a link from a email under > emacs; yes, I am reusing

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

On Thu, 14-04-2016, at 09:07, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: >> (...) >> Eric, do you mean the dlbsnail and S3.dlbsnail? Or do you mean the >> "LinkDownloads"? The last one I've not been able to get to work (seems to >> do nothing). > > I only installed the dlbsnail, and I

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

On Wed, 13-04-2016, at 21:44, Haider Rizvi wrote: > Ramon Diaz-Uriarte writes: > >> For me Conkeror works just great most of the time. But the main problem >> (for me) is that some of the extensions of Firefox will not work with >> Conkeror. > > Yes, well

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

Eric Abrahamsen writes: > Apart from that, though, this setup is fairly Conkeror like. Just > faster, and with fewer mysterious silent crashes! Faster!! I guess I have to try it out. Regards, -- Haider

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

Ramon Diaz-Uriarte writes: > On Mon, 11-04-2016, at 13:56, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: >> Ramon Diaz-Uriarte writes: >> >>> On Mon, 11-04-2016, at 10:12, Marcin Borkowski wrote: On 2016-04-11, at 06:37, Adam Porter

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

Ramon Diaz-Uriarte writes: > For me Conkeror works just great most of the time. But the main problem > (for me) is that some of the extensions of Firefox will not work with > Conkeror. Yes, well aware of the extensions issue. Since I had no solution, I started looking at it

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

Opera (when they were still using their own engine) had a lot of quite useful UI features, and could open hundreds of tabs without much slowdown. In the chrome port, they were back to basic chrome features, and even right now (after how many years?) it's not very different from using a

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

Dear Haider, On Tue, 12-04-2016, at 19:53, Haider Rizvi wrote: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> I've been using Conkeror (based on Xulrunner/Firefox) for a while >> now, and like it enough to stick with it. It's completely keyboard >> driven, which I

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

On Mon, 11-04-2016, at 13:56, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > Ramon Diaz-Uriarte writes: > >> On Mon, 11-04-2016, at 10:12, Marcin Borkowski wrote: >>> On 2016-04-11, at 06:37, Adam Porter wrote: >>> Eric

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

Haider Rizvi writes: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> I've been using Conkeror (based on Xulrunner/Firefox) for a while >> now, and like it enough to stick with it. It's completely keyboard >> driven, which I love. It's also not super stable, nor does

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

Eric Abrahamsen writes: > I've been using Conkeror (based on Xulrunner/Firefox) for a while > now, and like it enough to stick with it. It's completely keyboard > driven, which I love. It's also not super stable, nor does it seem > to be actively maintained, which I

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

Michael Welle writes: >> Did you submit a bug report? > no, I didn't. I think it's by design and more a feature request than a > bug. And to be honest, eww is not so important to me. w3m works quite > nice. The bug tracker is for feature requests also! Phil

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

Michael Welle writes: > Hallo, > > Peter Davis writes: > >> On Sat, Apr 9, 2016, at 02:09 PM, Marcin Borkowski wrote: >>> >>> eww ;-) >>> >> >> I never played with eww before. It looks interesting, but seriously, is >> there any way to cancel a large

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

Michael Welle writes: > Hallo, > > Peter Davis writes: > >> On Sat, Apr 9, 2016, at 02:09 PM, Marcin Borkowski wrote: >>> >>> eww ;-) >>> >> >> I never played with eww before. It looks interesting, but seriously, is >> there any way to cancel a large

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

On Sat, Apr 9, 2016, at 02:09 PM, Marcin Borkowski wrote: > > eww ;-) > I never played with eww before. It looks interesting, but seriously, is there any way to cancel a large download? My emacs is completely locked up now downloading an image from a site. I assume it's all customized with

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

Ramon Diaz-Uriarte writes: > On Mon, 11-04-2016, at 10:12, Marcin Borkowski wrote: >> On 2016-04-11, at 06:37, Adam Porter wrote: >> >>> Eric Abrahamsen ericabrahamsen.net> writes: >>> I had no idea Firefox did this... >>> >>>

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

On Mon, 11-04-2016, at 10:12, Marcin Borkowski wrote: > On 2016-04-11, at 06:37, Adam Porter wrote: > >> Eric Abrahamsen ericabrahamsen.net> writes: >> >>> I had no idea Firefox did this... >> >> ...You're not the only one... > > Me too, thanks for that

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

On 2016-04-11, at 06:37, Adam Porter wrote: > Eric Abrahamsen ericabrahamsen.net> writes: > >> I had no idea Firefox did this... > > ...You're not the only one... Me too, thanks for that tip!!! Best, -- Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

Eric Abrahamsen ericabrahamsen.net> writes: > I had no idea Firefox did this... ...You're not the only one...

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

Ramon Diaz-Uriarte writes: > Dear Eric, > > On Sun, 10-04-2016, at 15:17, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: >> Eric S Fraga writes: >> >> >> I installed the eww-lnum package right away, as that provides the main >> functionality I liked from

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

Richard Lawrence writes: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> I installed the eww-lnum package right away, as that provides the main >> functionality I liked from Conkeror: hit a key, and pick a link to do >> something with. Rather strangely,

[O] [OT] A new web browser‽

For my part I use IceCat. They have made a lot of progress recently if you are hesitating. As for key bindings the closest options to emacs I have found is firemacs: http://www.mew.org/~kazu/proj/firemacs/en/ Best regards, Jeremie

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

Dear Eric, On Sun, 10-04-2016, at 15:17, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > Eric S Fraga writes: > > > I installed the eww-lnum package right away, as that provides the main > functionality I liked from Conkeror: hit a key, and pick a link to do > something

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

Marcin Borkowski writes: > https://vivaldi.com/ > > Did anyone hear about it? Any thoughts/experiences? "Taking notes > while browsing" seems to be something close to org-capture, no? > Keyboard-driven might mean either vim-like or emacs-like bindings, or > (hopefully) configurable ones. I,

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

Eric Abrahamsen writes: > I installed the eww-lnum package right away, as that provides the main > functionality I liked from Conkeror: hit a key, and pick a link to do > something with. Rather strangely, the KeySnail plugin for Firefox seems > to do everything *but*

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

On Sunday, 10 Apr 2016 at 13:17, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > I installed the eww-lnum package right away, as that provides the main Thanks for the pointer! Excellent addition to eww. -- : Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 25.0.92.1, Org release_8.3.4-705-g716e33

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

Eric S Fraga writes: > On Sunday, 10 Apr 2016 at 02:42, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: >> Ahem... What I meant to say is that I haven't spent the time to figure >> out a quick, intuitive way to say "open *this* link in eww... now open >> *this* link in my external browser", etc. That

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

On Sunday, 10 Apr 2016 at 11:53, Sauli Heinola wrote: > I mostly use eww's `eww-browse-with-external-browser'-command, bound to > the &-key by default. The external browser is specified by the > `shr-external-browser'-variable. Ah, very helpful. Thanks. Works well. -- : Eric S Fraga

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

* Eric S Fraga : > My typical use is that eww is the default for any link I run into in > emacs. If the page visited is not appropriate, I simply hit w > (eww-copy-page-url), switch to Firefox and open the page ("o C-v RET" in > vimperator...). I mostly use eww's

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

On Sunday, 10 Apr 2016 at 02:42, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > Ahem... What I meant to say is that I haven't spent the time to figure > out a quick, intuitive way to say "open *this* link in eww... now open > *this* link in my external browser", etc. That was all. My typical use is that eww is the

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

Eric Abrahamsen writes: > Eric S Fraga writes: > >> On Saturday, 9 Apr 2016 at 18:09, Marcin Borkowski wrote: >>> On 2016-04-09, at 02:26, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: >> >> [...] >> actively maintained, which I don't love.

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

Eric S Fraga writes: > On Saturday, 9 Apr 2016 at 18:09, Marcin Borkowski wrote: >> On 2016-04-09, at 02:26, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > > [...] > >>> actively maintained, which I don't love. If anyone has recommendations >>> for better keyboard-driven

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

Rasmus writes: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> Adam Porter writes: >> >>> Marcin Borkowski mbork.pl> writes: >>> https://vivaldi.com/ Did anyone hear about it? Any thoughts/experiences? "Taking notes while

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

On Saturday, 9 Apr 2016 at 18:09, Marcin Borkowski wrote: > On 2016-04-09, at 02:26, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: [...] >> actively maintained, which I don't love. If anyone has recommendations >> for better keyboard-driven browsers, I'd love to hear them... > > eww ;-) I

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

Marcin Borkowski mbork.pl> writes: > I'm not an Opera user, so please enlighten me: what was wrong with it? > (The only info about Opera I have is from one of my friends, who liked > it a lot a few years ago.) I've never really been an Opera user either, other than trying it briefly. >From

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

On 2016-04-08, at 21:39, Oleh Krehel wrote: > Marcin Borkowski writes: > >> https://vivaldi.com/ > >> Did anyone hear about it? Any thoughts/experiences? > > It's a closed-source Chromium-based browser. Just ignore that nonsense. Well, while "nonsense"

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

On 2016-04-09, at 02:26, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > Adam Porter writes: > >> Marcin Borkowski mbork.pl> writes: >> >>> https://vivaldi.com/ >>> >>> Did anyone hear about it? Any thoughts/experiences? "Taking notes >>> while browsing" seems to be

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

On 2016-04-08, at 22:00, Adam Porter wrote: > Marcin Borkowski mbork.pl> writes: > >> https://vivaldi.com/ >> >> Did anyone hear about it? Any thoughts/experiences? "Taking notes >> while browsing" seems to be something close to org-capture, no? >> Keyboard-driven might

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

Eric Abrahamsen writes: > Adam Porter writes: > >> Marcin Borkowski mbork.pl> writes: >> >>> https://vivaldi.com/ >>> >>> Did anyone hear about it? Any thoughts/experiences? "Taking notes >>> while browsing" seems to be something close to

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

On Friday, 8 Apr 2016 at 22:00, Adam Porter wrote: [...] > It looks interesting, but it's not free software, so I have no interest Funnily enough, that's the first thing I checked. I think I'll stick with Firefox + vimperator for full keyboard controlled browsing. -- : Eric S Fraga

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

Adam Porter writes: > Marcin Borkowski mbork.pl> writes: > >> https://vivaldi.com/ >> >> Did anyone hear about it? Any thoughts/experiences? "Taking notes >> while browsing" seems to be something close to org-capture, no? >> Keyboard-driven might mean either vim-like or

Re: [O] [OT] A new web browser‽

Marcin Borkowski mbork.pl> writes: > https://vivaldi.com/ > > Did anyone hear about it? Any thoughts/experiences? "Taking notes > while browsing" seems to be something close to org-capture, no? > Keyboard-driven might mean either vim-like or emacs-like bindings, or > (hopefully) configurable

[O] [OT] A new web browser‽

https://vivaldi.com/ Did anyone hear about it? Any thoughts/experiences? "Taking notes while browsing" seems to be something close to org-capture, no? Keyboard-driven might mean either vim-like or emacs-like bindings, or (hopefully) configurable ones. I, for one, would like to try it out,