Re: [O] [PATCH] Let =`make'= be an option to =`org-latex-pdf-process'=.

2013-07-03 Thread Feng Shu
Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com writes: On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 07:09:35AM +0800, feng shu wrote: Customize `org-latex-pdf-process isn't very convenient. Is it possible add a feature like: #+LATEX_PDF_PROCESS: latexmk or add #OPTIONS: ;latex_pdf_process latexmk If you don't

Re: [O] [PATCH] Let =`make'= be an option to =`org-latex-pdf-process'=.

2013-07-03 Thread Bastien
Hi, Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com writes: If you don't mind my chiming in, the standard way to customise Emacs behaviour (across all modes, not just Org) is through customize-variable. Org cannot keep on introducing new keywords just because of convenience. In any case, this is

Re: [O] [PATCH] Let =`make'= be an option to =`org-latex-pdf-process'=.

2013-07-03 Thread Suvayu Ali
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 02:22:40PM +0800, Feng Shu wrote: Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com writes: On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 07:09:35AM +0800, feng shu wrote: Customize `org-latex-pdf-process isn't very convenient. Is it possible add a feature like: #+LATEX_PDF_PROCESS: latexmk

Re: [O] [PATCH] Let =`make'= be an option to =`org-latex-pdf-process'=.

2013-07-03 Thread Feng Shu
Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com writes: On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 02:22:40PM +0800, Feng Shu wrote: Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com writes: On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 07:09:35AM +0800, feng shu wrote: Customize `org-latex-pdf-process isn't very convenient. Is it possible add a

Re: [O] [PATCH] Let =`make'= be an option to =`org-latex-pdf-process'=.

2013-07-02 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, feng shu tuma...@gmail.com writes: From 63eba2e491a0c410b3841cbad2dd1a9f80416bca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Feng Shu tuma...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 11:52:10 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Let =`make'= be an option to =`org-latex-pdf-process'=. * ox-latex.el

Re: [O] [PATCH] Let =`make'= be an option to =`org-latex-pdf-process'=.

2013-07-02 Thread Jambunathan K
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: Hello, feng shu tuma...@gmail.com writes: From 63eba2e491a0c410b3841cbad2dd1a9f80416bca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Feng Shu tuma...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 11:52:10 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Let =`make'= be an option to

Re: [O] [PATCH] Let =`make'= be an option to =`org-latex-pdf-process'=.

2013-07-02 Thread Jambunathan K
AFAIU, `other' means whatever your answer is, always do the same, which is not what we want. If you want give whatever you want and we'll use it, it should be a `string' type. But can't `function', which is already implemented, do the same anyway? Well the OP can change the default value -

Re: [O] [PATCH] Let =`make'= be an option to =`org-latex-pdf-process'=.

2013-07-02 Thread feng shu
Customize `org-latex-pdf-process isn't very convenient. Is it possible add a feature like: #+LATEX_PDF_PROCESS: latexmk or add #OPTIONS: ;latex_pdf_process latexmk Feng On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.comwrote: Hello, feng shu tuma...@gmail.com writes:

Re: [O] [PATCH] Let =`make'= be an option to =`org-latex-pdf-process'=.

2013-07-02 Thread Suvayu Ali
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 07:09:35AM +0800, feng shu wrote: Customize `org-latex-pdf-process isn't very convenient. Is it possible add a feature like: #+LATEX_PDF_PROCESS: latexmk or add #OPTIONS: ;latex_pdf_process latexmk If you don't mind my chiming in, the standard way to customise

[O] [PATCH] Let =`make'= be an option to =`org-latex-pdf-process'=.

2013-07-01 Thread feng shu
0001-Let-make-be-an-option-to-org-latex-pdf-process.patch Description: Binary data