Re: [O] [PATCH] org.el (org-offer-links-in-entry): Remove code duplication

2014-05-15 Thread Bastien
Hi Albert, Achim Gratz writes: > Albert Krewinkel writes: >> Done. As an aside: I did sign the copyright assignment papers to be >> able to contrivute to Gnus, but that probably wouldn't help much, as >> Org is a different project. Is that correct? > > If you assigned copyright just for Gnus,

Re: [O] [PATCH] org.el (org-offer-links-in-entry): Remove code duplication

2014-05-11 Thread Achim Gratz
Albert Krewinkel writes: > Done. As an aside: I did sign the copyright assignment papers to be > able to contrivute to Gnus, but that probably wouldn't help much, as > Org is a different project. Is that correct? If you assigned copyright just for Gnus, then you'd have to do it again for Org. I

Re: [O] [PATCH] org.el (org-offer-links-in-entry): Remove code duplication

2014-05-11 Thread Albert Krewinkel
Hi Bastien, Bastien writes: > Albert Krewinkel writes: > >> * org.el (org-offer-links-in-entry): Use `org-any-link-re' to avoid >> code duplication. > > This is not really code duplication, as the output of `org-any-link-re' > is different from the output of the current sexp in the code. I'm

Re: [O] [PATCH] org.el (org-offer-links-in-entry): Remove code duplication

2014-05-06 Thread Bastien
Hi Albert, thanks for the patch. Albert Krewinkel writes: > * org.el (org-offer-links-in-entry): Use `org-any-link-re' to avoid > code duplication. This is not really code duplication, as the output of `org-any-link-re' is different from the output of the current sexp in the code. That said

[O] [PATCH] org.el (org-offer-links-in-entry): Remove code duplication

2014-04-25 Thread Albert Krewinkel
* org.el (org-offer-links-in-entry): Use `org-any-link-re' to avoid code duplication. The `re' variable defined in function `org-offer-links-in-entry' is string-equal to `org-any-link-re' and is hence replaced by the latter. This is a TINYCHANGE. --- lisp/org.el | 7 ++- 1 file changed, 2