Hi Carsten,
At Thu, 6 Oct 2011 10:35:18 +0200,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
Hi David,
I see that this patch is still on the patchwork server.
What is the status, I remember that you dot a number of
comments
Started to make a list of Org's behavior with headlines when region is
active but
Hi David,
On 8.10.2011, at 20:59, David Maus wrote:
Hi Carsten,
At Thu, 6 Oct 2011 10:35:18 +0200,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
Hi David,
I see that this patch is still on the patchwork server.
What is the status, I remember that you dot a number of
comments
Started to make a list
At Sat, 8 Oct 2011 22:11:37 +0200,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
Hi David,
On 8.10.2011, at 20:59, David Maus wrote:
Hi Carsten,
At Thu, 6 Oct 2011 10:35:18 +0200,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
Hi David,
I see that this patch is still on the patchwork server.
What is the status, I
Hi David,
I see that this patch is still on the patchwork server.
What is the status, I remember that you dot a number of
comments
- Carsten
On Aug 25, 2011, at 6:25 AM, David Maus wrote:
Hi Bastien,
Great -- can you submit a patch against current git head?
Following 5 patches
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 06:06:26 +0200
David Maus wrote:
At Wed, 07 Sep 2011 21:34:41 +0200,
Štěpán Němec wrote:
So your what stop me to implement a macro argument is bogus, isn't it?
I can't really comment on whether using a macro or not is the right
thing here, but it seems to me you
Guys, let's keep using a civil tone in discussions.
I will come back to this issue and see if I can help.
Thanks,
--
Bastien
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 12:41:45PM +0200, Bastien wrote:
Guys, let's keep using a civil tone in discussions.
I think you're confusing civil tone with political correctness
(which, in a lot of instances, can be translated as hypocrisy).
I don't think every sentence containing the word idiot is
At Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:26:31 +0200,
Štěpán Němec wrote:
Still, I'd rather we stuck to the point and expressed ourselves in a way
that doesn't imply the other side is either an idiot ...
Your message simply repeated my conclusion: Yes, the problem of
referencing a free variable in the macro
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 17:10:42 +0200
David Maus wrote:
At Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:26:31 +0200,
Štěpán Němec wrote:
Still, I'd rather we stuck to the point and expressed ourselves in a way
that doesn't imply the other side is either an idiot ...
Your message simply repeated my conclusion: Yes,
At Fri, 09 Sep 2011 17:26:43 +0200,
Štěpán Němec wrote:
The reason I asked (I didn't actually repeat anything, and it's all
apparently still far from obvious, at least to me) is that I'm confused:
You say I didn't implement is as a macro, because A. Now we both agree
that A is an invalid
At Wed, 07 Sep 2011 21:34:41 +0200,
Štěpán Němec wrote:
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 15:57:19 +0200
David Maus wrote:
At Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:08:42 +0200,
Štěpán Němec wrote:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 06:25:29 +0200
David Maus wrote:
As for the macro: What stop me to implement a macro for
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 15:57:19 +0200
David Maus wrote:
At Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:08:42 +0200,
Štěpán Němec wrote:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 06:25:29 +0200
David Maus wrote:
As for the macro: What stop me to implement a macro for the generic
operation is that for now the macro would depend on the
On Aug 28, 2011, at 3:58 PM, David Maus wrote:
Hi Carsten,
At Thu, 25 Aug 2011 08:13:21 +0200,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
I am wondering, why did you choose to skip invisible headlines?
I would worry that this introduces inconsistent behavior and also
makes it hard to use this feature in a
Hi Carsten,
At Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:29:04 +0200,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Aug 28, 2011, at 3:58 PM, David Maus wrote:
Hi Carsten,
At Thu, 25 Aug 2011 08:13:21 +0200,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
I am wondering, why did you choose to skip invisible headlines?
I would worry that this
At Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:08:42 +0200,
Štěpán Němec wrote:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 06:25:29 +0200
David Maus wrote:
As for the macro: What stop me to implement a macro for the generic
operation is that for now the macro would depend on the global
customization variable. That's not a problem
Hi Carsten,
At Thu, 25 Aug 2011 08:13:21 +0200,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
I am wondering, why did you choose to skip invisible headlines?
I would worry that this introduces inconsistent behavior and also
makes it hard to use this feature in a programmatic way.
Good points. I though of skipping
On 25.8.2011, at 06:25, David Maus wrote:Hi Bastien,Great -- can you submit a patch against current git head?Following 5 patches implement looping over headlines in active regionfor org-schedule and org-deadline. Invisible headlines are skippedHi David,I am wondering, why did you choose to skip
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 06:25:29 +0200
David Maus wrote:
As for the macro: What stop me to implement a macro for the generic
operation is that for now the macro would depend on the global
customization variable. That's not a problem per se but according to
my readings about macros (mostly in
Hi Bastien,
Great -- can you submit a patch against current git head?
Following 5 patches implement looping over headlines in active region
for org-schedule and org-deadline. Invisible headlines are skipped and
bulk-agenda commands work by binding the customization variable to nil
before
19 matches
Mail list logo
