Re: [O] [ox, patch] Keywords & what should go in ox?

2015-03-29 Thread Rasmus
Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Rasmus writes: > >> By this logic we'd have to add *every* "global" keyword, no? Does it make >> sense? > > Every global (as in "ox.el") keyword should be documented there, indeed. For now I have not moved the documentation as I'm not sure we know where to put it yet.

Re: [O] [ox, patch] Keywords & what should go in ox?

2015-03-28 Thread Rasmus
Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Rasmus writes: > >> By this logic we'd have to add *every* "global" keyword, no? Does it make >> sense? > > Every global (as in "ox.el") keyword should be documented there, indeed. OK. Marc: you expressed a desire to fix some bugs. I don't know if you like documenta

Re: [O] [ox, patch] Keywords & what should go in ox?

2015-03-28 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Rasmus writes: > By this logic we'd have to add *every* "global" keyword, no? Does it make > sense? Every global (as in "ox.el") keyword should be documented there, indeed. >>> At least SUBTITLE for ox-texinfo in not documented here. >> >> That's also a documentation bug. Note that it should p

Re: [O] [ox, patch] Keywords & what should go in ox?

2015-03-27 Thread Rasmus
Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> I have now reviewed this section twice, and I have no clue what you want >> me to change there. There's no :with-keywords or :with-description. > > I don't know either. I was sure that :keywords and :description were > here, but, oddly, it isn't the case. That's a docum

Re: [O] [ox, patch] Keywords & what should go in ox?

2015-03-26 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Rasmus writes: > I have now reviewed this section twice, and I have no clue what you want > me to change there. There's no :with-keywords or :with-description. I don't know either. I was sure that :keywords and :description were here, but, oddly, it isn't the case. That's a documentation bug as

Re: [O] [ox, patch] Keywords & what should go in ox?

2015-03-26 Thread Rasmus
Hi, Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> First, as discussed a while back we want to move DESCRIPTION and KEYWORDS >> out of ox.el as they are specific to certain backends. The first patch >> does this. > > [...] You need to update (info "(org)Publishing options") accordingly, > too. I have now reviewed

Re: [O] [ox, patch] Keywords & what should go in ox?

2015-03-21 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Rasmus writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> Do you think that you /always/ want "pdfkeywords" to hold exactly the >> same contents as what you could put in your document? > > You as in me: yes most certainly. IIUC, it contradicts your initial post where you wanted, at some later time, to add

Re: [O] [ox, patch] Keywords & what should go in ox?

2015-03-19 Thread Rasmus
Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Do you think that you /always/ want "pdfkeywords" to hold exactly the > same contents as what you could put in your document? You as in me: yes most certainly. > Do you think that a user who wants to fill pdfkeywords will always want > to also add these contents in the

Re: [O] [ox, patch] Keywords & what should go in ox?

2015-03-19 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Rasmus writes: > Keywords are akin to small headings to identify the contents of a > document. I see no reason to restrict this to the reader of the > electronic version of a document. What are you talking about? I don't want to restrict anything: AFAIU, the feature you propose already exists i

Re: [O] [ox, patch] Keywords & what should go in ox?

2015-03-18 Thread Rasmus
Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Rasmus writes: > >> Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> >>> We don't need a convoluted markup for that, let's keep it simple. >> >> But then you'd have to repeat data. E.g. >> >> #+KEYWORDS: my keywords for meta-data that should also be printed. >> my keywords for meta-data th

Re: [O] [ox, patch] Keywords & what should go in ox?

2015-03-17 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Rasmus writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> We don't need a convoluted markup for that, let's keep it simple. > > But then you'd have to repeat data. E.g. > > #+KEYWORDS: my keywords for meta-data that should also be printed. > my keywords for meta-data that should also be printed. > > This s

Re: [O] [ox, patch] Keywords & what should go in ox?

2015-03-17 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Rasmus writes: > First, as discussed a while back we want to move DESCRIPTION and KEYWORDS > out of ox.el as they are specific to certain backends. The first patch > does this. Thanks. You can remove the keywords from "ox-org.el" and "ox-ascii.el", as they do not use them. You need to

Re: [O] [ox, patch] Keywords & what should go in ox?

2015-03-17 Thread Rasmus
Nicolas Goaziou writes: > We don't need a convoluted markup for that, let's keep it simple. But then you'd have to repeat data. E.g. #+KEYWORDS: my keywords for meta-data that should also be printed. my keywords for meta-data that should also be printed. This seems error prone and undesirable

[O] [ox, patch] Keywords & what should go in ox?

2015-03-14 Thread Rasmus
Hi, First, as discussed a while back we want to move DESCRIPTION and KEYWORDS out of ox.el as they are specific to certain backends. The first patch does this. Second, I want to add support for printing keywords. This patch is still rough (i.e. no need commenting), but before proceeding I want