On 21/10/2019 23:24, Vladimir Nikishkin wrote:
> Well, checking for "output" doesn't seem to be useful any way, since
> "output" is never 'nil.
>
> Regarding the fact that the error should be reported to the geiser
> mailing list, that's entirely true. The problem is that the person who
> would
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 15:16, Vladimir Nikishkin
wrote:
> Yeah. The "output" is not the result of geiser's elisp functions, as far
> as I understand, it comes from comint, which reads it from a scheme
> interpreter, and is expected to be formatted specifically to be fed into
>
Hi Vladimir,
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 03:21, Vladimir Nikishkin
wrote:
>
> Can we replace the (set) on line 177 of ob-scheme.el with the following
> form:
> (setq result (if output
> (let ((g-r-o (geiser-eval--retort-output ret)))
> (if g-r-o
>
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
https://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
Your bug report will be posted to the Org mailing list.
