Bastien writes:
> Hi all,
>
> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>
>> I'm sure this idea wouldn't be a net benefit for Org syntax clarity,
>> even for the occasional three lines caption need.
>
> I agree.
>
> Nicolas, what do you think of enhancing the auto-filling (and
> delete-indentation) capabilities f
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Bastien writes:
>
>> Yes. #+CAPTION[...]: is clumsy.
>
> It follows #+RESULTS[...]: model.
Which I feel clumsy too :) No offense to either Eric or you.
The important difference is that #+RESULTS[...] is generated,
while #+CAPTION[...] is manually entered. As a user
Bastien writes:
> Yes. #+CAPTION[...]: is clumsy.
It follows #+RESULTS[...]: model.
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Andreas Leha writes:
> But here an obvious
> 'solution' would be to move the short caption to #+SHORT_CAPTION.
Yes. #+CAPTION[...]: is clumsy.
--
Bastien
Hello,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
>> Nicolas, what do you think of enhancing the auto-filling (and
>> delete-indentation) capabilities for some affiliated keywords?
>>
>> #+CAPTION:
>> #+HEADER:
>> #+TBLFM:
>
> Not that it matters much, but "TBLFM" is not an affiliated keyword per
> se,
Hello,
> Nicolas, what do you think of enhancing the auto-filling (and
> delete-indentation) capabilities for some affiliated keywords?
>
> #+CAPTION:
> #+HEADER:
> #+TBLFM:
Not that it matters much, but "TBLFM" is not an affiliated keyword per
se, it belongs to the table syntax. OTOH, you can ha
Hi all,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> I'm sure this idea wouldn't be a net benefit for Org syntax clarity,
> even for the occasional three lines caption need.
I agree.
Nicolas, what do you think of enhancing the auto-filling (and
delete-indentation) capabilities for some affiliated keywords?
#+CA
Hello,
Eric Schulte writes:
> For a while now I've been wishing that keywords (namely #+Caption:)
> could be equivalently specified as blocks (e.g., #+begin/end_Caption:).
>
> Would that be another possible solution here?
That would defeat the purpose of the distinction between a block and an
a
Eric Schulte writes:
> Andrea Rossetti writes:
>
>> Hello Bastien and everyone reading,
>>
>> Bastien writes:
>>> Could you list other options that are good candidates for such
>>> auto-filling fonctionality? We'd better implement them all at
>>> once.
>>
>> I'd suggest to split the wish-lis
Andrea Rossetti writes:
> Hello Bastien and everyone reading,
>
> Bastien writes:
>> Could you list other options that are good candidates for such
>> auto-filling fonctionality? We'd better implement them all at
>> once.
>
> I'd suggest to split the wish-list in two buckets, i.e.
>
> 1) som
Hello Bastien and everyone reading,
Bastien writes:
> Could you list other options that are good candidates for such
> auto-filling fonctionality? We'd better implement them all at
> once.
I'd suggest to split the wish-list in two buckets, i.e.
1) some "#+..." commands would benefit of a l
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 3:43 AM, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Andreas Leha writes:
>
>> Would it be possible to have filling of captions?
>
> I guess so.
>
>> Ideally that would mean at least two things: auto-fill and M-q
>> working on long captions.
>
> Yes.
>
> Could you list other options t
Hi,
ยท Andreas Leha wrote:
> Hi Bastien,
>
> Bastien writes:
>
>> Andreas Leha writes:
>>
>>> Do you mean (1) other places in org files (other than #+caption) or
>>> (2) other functionality that should be supported at #+caption
>>> filling?
>>
>> Normally lines matching the regexp ^#\+\S-+ (lik
Hi Bastien,
Bastien writes:
> Andreas Leha writes:
>
>> Do you mean (1) other places in org files (other than #+caption) or
>> (2) other functionality that should be supported at #+caption
>> filling?
>
> Normally lines matching the regexp ^#\+\S-+ (like #+CAPTION) should
> not be filled. We w
Andreas Leha writes:
> Do you mean (1) other places in org files (other than #+caption) or
> (2) other functionality that should be supported at #+caption
> filling?
Normally lines matching the regexp ^#\+\S-+ (like #+CAPTION) should
not be filled. We would introduce an exception where successi
Hi Bastien,
Bastien writes:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Andreas Leha writes:
>
>> Would it be possible to have filling of captions?
>
> I guess so.
>
Thanks for the good news! Now I am waiting for christmas ;-)
>> Ideally that would mean at least two things: auto-fill and M-q
>> working on long captio
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Leha writes:
> Would it be possible to have filling of captions?
I guess so.
> Ideally that would mean at least two things: auto-fill and M-q
> working on long captions.
Yes.
Could you list other options that are good candidates for such
auto-filling fonctionality? We'd
Hi all,
a currently active thread about filling
(http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/77700) reminded me of a
long standing wish of mine: Filling of captions.
Would it be possible to have filling of captions? Ideally that would
mean at least two things: auto-fill and M-q working on lo
18 matches
Mail list logo
