Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>>> Let's think about it. If user has a non-nil
>>> `org-list-allow-alphabetical' and don't use them, should we make sure
>>> that items are _never_ alphabetical in the output (i.e. always numbers)?
>>
>> Clearly no.
>
> Interesting. As you know, pdflatex will produce, at
On 1.7.2013, at 13:49, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Bastien writes:
>
>> Given that Org allows alphabetical list, the OP question is
>> natural and will come back.
>
> Of course it will. And it had been discussed when the feature was
> introduced. I don't mind discussing it again, but there's not
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Whatever the conclusion of this thread is, I hope it will make for a FAQ
> entry so we do not start it over every now and then.
Here is it: http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.html#sec-11-5
--
Bastien
The buck stops with the maintainer of the files. It is only polite and
good etiquette that any change that is not-trivial or not-routine be
discussed beforehand.
Sneaking in changes - just because it can be done in 5 minutes - is what
a jerk would do.
Bastien writes:
> (I've removed the feature from maint (and master) so that we can take
> the time to discuss it.)
Fair enough.
>> Let's think about it. If user has a non-nil
>> `org-list-allow-alphabetical' and don't use them, should we make sure
>> that items are _never_ alphabetical in the o
(I've removed the feature from maint (and master) so that we can take
the time to discuss it.)
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Bastien writes:
>
>> Given that Org allows alphabetical list, the OP question is
>> natural and will come back.
>
> Of course it will. And it had been discussed when the feat
Bastien writes:
> Given that Org allows alphabetical list, the OP question is
> natural and will come back.
Of course it will. And it had been discussed when the feature was
introduced. I don't mind discussing it again, but there's nothing new on
the table. I thought it had a FAQ entry: I was wr
Hello,
Bastien wrote:
> Bastien writes:
>
>> I see no harm in supporting more flexibility where we can.
>
> I should add that Org is a way for many LaTeX newbies to discover LaTeX,
> supporting alphabetical lists in LaTeX (and other backend) goes into this
> direction IMO.
Speaking of lists, whe
Bastien writes:
> I see no harm in supporting more flexibility where we can.
I should add that Org is a way for many LaTeX newbies to discover
LaTeX, supporting alphabetical lists in LaTeX (and other backend)
goes into this direction IMO.
--
Bastien
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Therefore, I suggest to revert the patch.
This simple .tex file allows for alphabetical enumeration.
Given that Org allows alphabetical list, the OP question is
natural and will come back. There is no clue in Org that
alphabetical lists are just visual cl
Hello,
Bastien writes:
> Josiah Schwab writes:
>
>> I am using orgmode 8.0.3 with emacs 24.3. I frequently use
>> ordered lists with alphabetical bullets. I have
>> (setq org-list-allow-alphabetical t)
>> in my .emacs.
>
> You should be able to export them to lists now
> (from the maint br
Hi Josiah,
Josiah Schwab writes:
> I am using orgmode 8.0.3 with emacs 24.3. I frequently use
> ordered lists with alphabetical bullets. I have
> (setq org-list-allow-alphabetical t)
> in my .emacs.
You should be able to export them to lists now
(from the maint branch, which will be the ne
Hi All,
I am using orgmode 8.0.3 with emacs 24.3. I frequently use
ordered lists with alphabetical bullets. I have
(setq org-list-allow-alphabetical t)
in my .emacs.
I just noticed that when I export an alphabetical list using the HTML
exporter, it appears as a numerical list in the rendered
13 matches
Mail list logo
