Re: [O] Should org-narrow-to-subtree be disabled by default?

2014-01-03 Thread Rasmus
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes: Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes: Bastien b...@gnu.org writes: one good way to decide could be to ask people here if they ever accidentally narrowed the view to a subtree -- I never did. No. But I know the concept of narrowing, which may be unfamiliar to some. I

Re: [O] Should org-narrow-to-subtree be disabled by default?

2014-01-03 Thread Bastien
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes: Bastien b...@gnu.org writes: one good way to decide could be to ask people here if they ever accidentally narrowed the view to a subtree -- I never did. No. But I know the concept of narrowing, which may be unfamiliar to some. I find narrowing super useful,

[O] Should org-narrow-to-subtree be disabled by default?

2013-11-23 Thread Jisang Yoo
There are some Emacs commands that come disabled by default. narrow-to-region and narrow-to-page are examples. Emacs manual says The purpose of disabling a command is to prevent users from executing it by accident; we do this for commands that might be confusing to the uninitiated. 80% of my mind

Re: [O] Should org-narrow-to-subtree be disabled by default?

2013-11-23 Thread Bastien
Hi Jisang, one good way to decide could be to ask people here if they ever accidentally narrowed the view to a subtree -- I never did. Also, I tend to think Emacs is on the paranoid side here, I don't think newbies can hit C-x n n accidentally... Let me know what you think, -- Bastien

Re: [O] Should org-narrow-to-subtree be disabled by default?

2013-11-23 Thread Rasmus
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes: one good way to decide could be to ask people here if they ever accidentally narrowed the view to a subtree -- I never did. No. But I know the concept of narrowing, which may be unfamiliar to some. I find narrowing super useful, especially when writing longer