Re: [O] Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week

2012-05-15 Thread Nick Dokos
SW wrote: > Nick Dokos hp.com> writes: > > > > > But I saw a message implying that Debian does not consider emacs > > documentation free (!?!?), so the info files may be in > > emacs23-common-non-dfsg in this case. > > Thanks, that's the package :) > > FWIW, I think you meant: > > (info "

Re: [O] Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week

2012-05-15 Thread Nick Dokos
Memnon Anon wrote: > Nick Dokos writes: > > > But I saw a message implying that Debian does not consider emacs > > documentation free (!?!?), so the info files may be in > > emacs23-common-non-dfsg in this case. > > The FSF isn't the only one caring about "Freedom". > Where more than one entit

Re: [O] Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week

2012-05-15 Thread SW
Nick Dokos hp.com> writes: > But I saw a message implying that Debian does not consider emacs > documentation free (!?!?), so the info files may be in > emacs23-common-non-dfsg in this case. Thanks, that's the package :) FWIW, I think you meant: (info "(emacs) Key Binding Commands") earlie

Re: [O] Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week

2012-05-15 Thread Memnon Anon
Nick Dokos writes: > But I saw a message implying that Debian does not consider emacs > documentation free (!?!?), so the info files may be in > emacs23-common-non-dfsg in this case. The FSF isn't the only one caring about "Freedom". Where more than one entity exists, they are bound to disagree

Re: [O] Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week

2012-05-15 Thread Nick Dokos
SW wrote: > Brian van den Broek gmail.com> writes: > > > A data point: > > I've the same broken info system on the ssame version of CrunchBang. > > I really like cb, but there are wrinkles like that. The TODO for > > solving that hasn't percolated up my list yet > > In the meantime, I've posed

Re: [O] Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week

2012-05-15 Thread SW
Brian van den Broek gmail.com> writes: > A data point: > I've the same broken info system on the ssame version of CrunchBang. > I really like cb, but there are wrinkles like that. The TODO for > solving that hasn't percolated up my list yet In the meantime, I've posed it on the CrunchBang forums

Re: [O] Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week

2012-05-15 Thread Brian van den Broek
On 15 May 2012 17:25, "SW" wrote: > Aside: Hitting ``M-: (info "(emacs) Customizing Key Bindings")`` gives me an > error about the info file not existing. I installed Emacs 23.2.1 in CrunchBang > Linux (Debian Stable) and (IIRC) org-mode 7.8.06 via a Debian package. Any ideas? > A data point:

Re: [O] Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week

2012-05-15 Thread Nick Dokos
SW wrote: > Nick Dokos hp.com> writes: > > > > Should I just bind ``C-u 7 S-right`` and ``C-u 7 S-left``? > > > I wouldn't bother but I'm not you: if you really want to, you can > > define a trivial function > > > >(defun sw-one-week-bump () > >(org-timestamp-up-day 7)) > > > >

Re: [O] Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week

2012-05-15 Thread SW
Nick Dokos hp.com> writes: > > Should I just bind ``C-u 7 S-right`` and ``C-u 7 S-left``? > I wouldn't bother but I'm not you: if you really want to, you can > define a trivial function > >(defun sw-one-week-bump () >(org-timestamp-up-day 7)) > > and bind it. >(info "(emacs

Re: [O] Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week

2012-05-15 Thread SW
Christian Moe christianmoe.com> writes: > Oops, sorry! Forgot the double-plus. > > With point on the timestamp, > > C-c . ++1w Ah, that works. Thanks :)

Re: [O] Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week

2012-05-15 Thread Christian Moe
Oops, sorry! Forgot the double-plus. With point on the timestamp, C-c . ++1w Yours, Christian On 5/15/12 3:42 PM, SW wrote: Christian Moe christianmoe.com> writes: C-c . +1w This updates the timestamp to be one week from *today*. I want to push the timestamp one week forward from wherev

Re: [O] Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week

2012-05-15 Thread Nick Dokos
SW wrote: > Pressing S-left/right anywhere on a timestamp decreases/increases it by one > day. > > Pressing S-down/up on a component of a timestamp decreases/increases it by one > unit of that component. > > How can we include an easy and quick way to decrease/increase the timestamp by > one w

Re: [O] Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week

2012-05-15 Thread SW
Christian Moe christianmoe.com> writes: > C-c . +1w This updates the timestamp to be one week from *today*. I want to push the timestamp one week forward from wherever it is.

Re: [O] Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week

2012-05-15 Thread Christian Moe
C-c . +1w Yours, Christian On 5/15/12 3:34 PM, SW wrote: Pressing S-left/right anywhere on a timestamp decreases/increases it by one day. Pressing S-down/up on a component of a timestamp decreases/increases it by one unit of that component. How can we include an easy and quick way to decrease

[O] Timestamp: Forward or backward by a week

2012-05-15 Thread SW
Pressing S-left/right anywhere on a timestamp decreases/increases it by one day. Pressing S-down/up on a component of a timestamp decreases/increases it by one unit of that component. How can we include an easy and quick way to decrease/increase the timestamp by one week. I find myself having to