Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> It's a first step. It would be nice to get rid of `org-split-string'
> altogether in the long run. We may make `org-split-string' an obsolete
> alias for `split-string', and update code base accordingly.
Agreed. I was unclear, I meant: why not using split-string instea
Hello,
Bastien Guerry writes:
> I pushed a tiny clean up here. Next question is: why not using
>
> (split-string STRING SEPARATORS t)
>
> ?
It's a first step. It would be nice to get rid of `org-split-string'
altogether in the long run. We may make `org-split-string' an obsolete
alias for `spl
Hi Marcin,
Marcin Borkowski writes:
> I don't want to be nitpicking, but I'm just curious. I'm looking at the
> function `org-split-string'. It uses (two times) the following
> construction:
>
> (setq list (cons (something) list))
>
> Is there any particular reason for not using `push' there?
Hi Marcin,
Marcin Borkowski wrote:
> I don't want to be nitpicking, but I'm just curious. I'm looking at the
> function `org-split-string'. It uses (two times) the following
> construction:
>
> (setq list (cons (something) list))
>
> Is there any particular reason for not using `push' there?
II
On 2015-02-15, at 12:35, Rasmus wrote:
> Marcin Borkowski writes:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I don't want to be nitpicking, but I'm just curious. I'm looking at the
>> function `org-split-string'. It uses (two times) the following
>> construction:
>>
>> (setq list (cons (something) list))
>>
>> Is
On 2015-02-15, at 13:26, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> Ah well, maybe we'll trick someone else into it :)
;-)
> My own personal project is to spend a bit of every day working on the
> emacs packages that make my computing life possible: Org, Gnus, and
> BBDB. I'd prefer to spend most of it on Org,
On 2015-02-15, at 22:22, Yuri Niyazov wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Nicolas Goaziou
> wrote:
>> No. Good luck with refactoring "org.el". ;)
>
> Could you clarify what you think are the biggest issues with
> refactoring org.el ?
IMHO, the biggest and most useful thing would be to d
Yuri Niyazov writes:
> Could you clarify what you think are the biggest issues with
> refactoring org.el ?
Its size.
Regards,
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> No. Good luck with refactoring "org.el". ;)
Could you clarify what you think are the biggest issues with
refactoring org.el ?
Marcin Borkowski writes:
> On 2015-02-15, at 11:42, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>
>> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Marcin Borkowski writes:
>>>
I don't want to be nitpicking, but I'm just curious. I'm looking at the
function `org-split-string'. It uses (two times) the fo
Marcin Borkowski writes:
> Hi there,
>
> I don't want to be nitpicking, but I'm just curious. I'm looking at the
> function `org-split-string'. It uses (two times) the following
> construction:
>
> (setq list (cons (something) list))
>
> Is there any particular reason for not using `push' there
On 2015-02-15, at 11:42, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Marcin Borkowski writes:
>>
>>> I don't want to be nitpicking, but I'm just curious. I'm looking at the
>>> function `org-split-string'. It uses (two times) the following
>>> construction:
>>>
>>> (se
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> Marcin Borkowski writes:
>
>> I don't want to be nitpicking, but I'm just curious. I'm looking at the
>> function `org-split-string'. It uses (two times) the following
>> construction:
>>
>> (setq list (cons (something) list))
>>
>> Is there any particular
Hello,
Marcin Borkowski writes:
> I don't want to be nitpicking, but I'm just curious. I'm looking at the
> function `org-split-string'. It uses (two times) the following
> construction:
>
> (setq list (cons (something) list))
>
> Is there any particular reason for not using `push' there?
No.
Hi there,
I don't want to be nitpicking, but I'm just curious. I'm looking at the
function `org-split-string'. It uses (two times) the following
construction:
(setq list (cons (something) list))
Is there any particular reason for not using `push' there?
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd
15 matches
Mail list logo
