Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

> "Adam" == Adam Porter writes: Adam> Colin Baxter writes: >> I notice that your instructions give (require >> 'org-protocol). Does that mean (setq org-modules (quote >> (org-protocol))) no longer works? Adam> No, that should work

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

Colin Baxter writes: > I notice that your instructions give (require 'org-protocol). Does that > mean (setq org-modules (quote (org-protocol))) no longer works? No, that should work too, as long as that is run before Org is loaded. You may prefer to use the customize

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

Dear Adam, > "Adam" == Adam Porter writes: Adam> FYI, I have some instructions for setting up org-protocol at Adam> https://github.com/alphapapa/org-protocol-capture-html#org-protocol-instructions Adam> and https://stackoverflow.com/a/32851154 I notice that

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

Mario Martelli writes: > I suppose so, if one knows how to configure URL handlers on their > OS. Of course there are some things missing from the > documentation. But it’s more than we have at the moment :) FYI, I have some instructions for setting up org-protocol at

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

Hello, Mario Martelli writes: > sorry for late response. I like the new docs very much. > > I would like to suggest some minor changes. Thank you for the feedback. I included your suggestions and pushed the change. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

Hi,sorry for late response. I like the new docs very much.I would like to suggest some minor changes. 0001-oprg-prtocol-minor-changes-to-new-documentation.patch Description: Binary data Kind regardsMario—  Am 06.07.2017 um 19:54 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou :Hello,Mario

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

Hello, Mario Martelli writes: > I started this whole thing because I wanted to learn elisp. But > learning texinfo en-passant is nice :) Thank you for your patch. I re-worded the documentation based on your work. I also added more index entries. Since I'm not using

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

>> This one I do not understand. >> I use now @file{emacsclient} consistently if that was the meaning of the >> comment. >> > > No, it's a much more mundane style issue: you need to have two spaces after a > period. :smile: I hope I got that changed too ;) rgrds Mario — smime.p7s

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

Mario Martelli writes: >>> +Org protocol is triggered by @file{emacsclient}. If you want to use Org >> ^^^ >> Gotcha >> >>> +protocol, there are many possibilities to do

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

>> I’m not happy with that there is so much information - although >> outdated - in the old Worg documentation which might be hidden to the >> reader. > > Note that most of this documentation is available through other > means, AFAIU. Ok, what I meant are the readers who are not able to use

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Mario Martelli writes: >> outdated - in the old Worg documentation which might be hidden to the >> reader. > > Note that Ahem. Note that most of this documentation is available through other means, AFAIU.

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

Mario Martelli writes: >> Genuine question: is this documentation actually complete enough to use >> the feature? > > I suppose so, if one knows how to configure URL handlers on their OS. > Of course there are some things missing from the documentation. But > it’s more

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

Hi, >> Any comments? > > Always ;) :-) > Are there really two functions? You only > document one. Hope it’s clearer now. > Genuine question: is this documentation actually complete enough to use > the feature? I suppose so, if one knows how to configure URL handlers on their OS. Of course

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

Hello, Mario Martelli writes: > I created a pretty short documentation of org-protocol. It’s still > mainly copied from the old documentation. But distilled :) Thank you. > It might be an idea to link to the old documentation at worg. I'd rather not do that.

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

Hi, > I’ll start with a fresh approach and try to bring up a short manual in > org.texi. I created a pretty short documentation of org-protocol. It’s still mainly copied from the old documentation. But distilled :) It might be an idea to link to the old documentation at worg. I know that it

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

>> +worked for me on Windows-XP Professional and the emasc23 from >> ourcomments.org >> +(@uref{http://ourcomments.org/cgi-bin/emacsw32-dl-latest.pl >> }). I'm no Windows user >> +though and enhancements are more

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

Hi, > Besides the changes suggested above, we should put some thinking in the > structure, which may be not adapter for a manual. In particular, it > should be made shorter. My attempt was to copy the existing documentation from worg to the core documentation and to leave as much as possible

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

Hello, Mario Martelli writes: > Please note, that the documentation assumes that the patches regarding > “open-source” are applied. Thank you. > +You can set up Org for handling protocol calls from outside > +applications that are passed to Emacs through the >

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

Hi, > Also, I suggest using ox-texinfo from development version, if you can, > as the Texinfo output should be superior. Done that, eventually. > Also, if the syntax is not quite right, no worries, > we'll fix it. That is probably necessary. Please note, that the documentation assumes that

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

Hi, > fails all the time causing the function to fail silently. I got "open-source" working by sanitising the URI before it is processed. diff --git a/lisp/org-protocol.el b/lisp/org-protocol.el index 825435674..7e986a9ed 100644 --- a/lisp/org-protocol.el +++ b/lisp/org-protocol.el @@ -520,7

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

Hi, > Am 22.06.2017 um 22:03 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou : > > So as to ease the reviewing process, could you send it on the ML with > git format-patch sub-command? > sure. I would like to add an example using the subprotocol “open-source” for hugo. If that sounds ok for

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

Hello, Mario Martelli writes: > I’ve incorporated the org-protocol documentation into org.texi. > > https://github.com/mgmart/org-mode/commit/31dd3cc13034c8501d8526e25086152a0e6538dd > >

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

I’ve incorporated the org-protocol documentation into org.texi. https://github.com/mgmart/org-mode/commit/31dd3cc13034c8501d8526e25086152a0e6538dd In a separate branch you could see the history of changes to

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

I’m about to incorporate the new style URIs into the documentation. During my tests somehow the open-source protocol does not work for me. I assume a bug around Line 527 in org-protocol.el (let* ((base-url (plist-get (cdr prolist) :base-url)) —> (wsearch (regexp-quote

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

Mario Martelli writes: >> However, AFAIU, this change is about orgmanual.org, which is an outdated >> copy of the official manual in contrib/. > > Well, I thought I could begin with an easy task for my first contribution :) > >> Could you modify "org.texi" in doc/

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

> However, AFAIU, this change is about orgmanual.org, which is an outdated > copy of the official manual in contrib/. Well, I thought I could begin with an easy task for my first contribution :) > Could you modify "org.texi" in doc/ directory instead? This will take a while, I assume. Although

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

Hello, Mario Martelli writes: > Please find my attempt at: https://github.com/mgmart/org-mode > Thank you. However, AFAIU, this change is about orgmanual.org, which is an outdated copy of the official manual in contrib/. Could

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

Mario Martelli writes: >> for what it's worth, the Emacs Mac Port supports org-protocol out of >> box. It works without the Emacs server (emacsclient), e.g., > > Good to know. I’ve listed it in the documentation. > Do you plan to provide ready built binaries? The

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

> for what it's worth, the Emacs Mac Port supports org-protocol out of > box. It works without the Emacs server (emacsclient), e.g., Good to know. I’ve listed it in the documentation. Do you plan to provide ready built binaries? >> - if not, I would update the documentation in general and for

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

Mario Martelli writes: > Hi, > > recently I’ve updated my macOS - Org mode setup. I had some pain setting up > org-protocol properly for what it's worth, the Emacs Mac Port supports org-protocol out of box. It works without the Emacs server (emacsclient), e.g., $

Re: [O] org-protocol documentation

Hello, Mario Martelli writes: > recently I’ve updated my macOS - Org mode setup. I had some pain > setting up org-protocol properly which was mainly because the > documentation (http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/org-protocol.html >

[O] org-protocol documentation

Hi, recently I’ve updated my macOS - Org mode setup. I had some pain setting up org-protocol properly which was mainly because the documentation (http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/org-protocol.html ) is outdated. Especially for macOS. I