Much appreciated. Color works perfectly.
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
> John Hendy wrote:
>
> > Tried this and it works well -- the output is definitely much better! One
> oddity -- the EPS
> > generated is black and white whereas the typical output was in color...
> silly
John Hendy wrote:
> Tried this and it works well -- the output is definitely much better! One
> oddity -- the EPS
> generated is black and white whereas the typical output was in color... silly
> option I'm missing?
>
"monochrome" is default:
,
| set terminal postscript eps enhanced 20
|
Tried this and it works well -- the output is definitely much better! One
oddity -- the EPS generated is black and white whereas the typical output
was in color... silly option I'm missing?
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 11:17:33 +0100, Eric S Fraga
Thanks for both tips -- I'll give these a try on Monday when I'm back at
work. Much appreciated!
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 5:17 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:35:52 -0700, "Eric Schulte"
> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > WRT: the ugliness of gnuplot to file, I've wrestled with this mysel
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 11:17:33 +0100, Eric S Fraga wrote:
[...]
> for instance. Then, if I need bitmap images, I use "convert" from
> ImageMagick to create these from the EPS files with the required
> density (depending on intended use, whether screen display or
> printing), as in
>
> convert
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:35:52 -0700, "Eric Schulte"
wrote:
[...]
> WRT: the ugliness of gnuplot to file, I've wrestled with this myself and
> I know exactly what you mean. Currently I try to use svg or png images
> when exporting to html, and for pdf I use the gnuplot tikz terminal [2].
John &
