Thanks for both tips -- I'll give these a try on Monday when I'm back at work. Much appreciated!
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 5:17 AM, Eric S Fraga <ucec...@ucl.ac.uk> wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:35:52 -0700, "Eric Schulte" <schulte.e...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > [...] > > > WRT: the ugliness of gnuplot to file, I've wrestled with this myself and > > I know exactly what you mean. Currently I try to use svg or png images > > when exporting to html, and for pdf I use the gnuplot tikz terminal [2]. > > John & Eric, > > Another approach, which I use and which doesn't require using the > development version of gnuplot for the tikz support, is to generate > encapsulated postscript files: > > set terminal postscript eps enhanced 20 > set output "graph.eps" > > for instance. Then, if I need bitmap images, I use "convert" from > ImageMagick to create these from the EPS files with the required > density (depending on intended use, whether screen display or > printing), as in > > convert -quality 95 -density 300 graph.eps graph.png > > With EPS, you can get very nice looking text, especially with the > "enhanced" gnuplot set terminal option and the result is size > independent. > > -- > Eric S Fraga > GnuPG: 8F5C 279D 3907 E14A 5C29 570D C891 93D8 FFFC F67D > >
_______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
