Hi Dan,
On 2010-04-27, Dan Davison davi...@stats.ox.ac.uk wrote:
Another way to look at it is that this is an annotation mechanism. It
can be used for any type of file or buffer. This would include text,
websites (i.e. pointing to and annotating documents on the web),
dired, source code,
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:40:35 -0400, Dan Davison davi...@stats.ox.ac.uk wrote:
I'm considering investigating the following and would appreciate
comments on this idea. The aim is to make it easier to use Org-mode to
work pure code files which are *external to Org-mode* (i.e. this
proposal lies
This functionality would be really useful. Since it is more directly
applicable for programming, then maybe an easier approach to implement it
would be just a link to a function in a file. For instance
[[file_def:/path/to/file::definition_name][linkname]]
Org could rely on the capability of the
Darlan Cavalcante Moreira darc...@gmail.com writes:
This functionality would be really useful. Since it is more directly
applicable for programming, then maybe an easier approach to implement it
would be just a link to a function in a file. For instance
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes:
Darlan Cavalcante Moreira darc...@gmail.com writes:
This functionality would be really useful. Since it is more directly
applicable for programming, then maybe an easier approach to implement it
would be just a link to a function in a file. For
Another way to look at it is that this is an annotation mechanism. It
can be used for any type of file or buffer. This would include text,
websites (i.e. pointing to and annotating documents on the web),
dired, source code, org files, html source, etc.
Modifying existing link syntax will be
Dan Davison davi...@stats.ox.ac.uk writes:
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes:
Darlan Cavalcante Moreira darc...@gmail.com writes:
This functionality would be really useful. Since it is more directly
applicable for programming, then maybe an easier approach to implement it
would be
Dan Davison davi...@stats.ox.ac.uk writes:
This sounds like an interesting idea; I have been meaning to use tags
more. However, I wouldn't want to exclude the possibility of using this
functionality in a non-programming context -- i.e. collaborative editing
of arbitrary text documents --
On Apr 27, 2010, at 9:19 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
Samuel Wales samolog...@gmail.com writes:
Another way to look at it is that this is an annotation mechanism.
It
can be used for any type of file or buffer. This would include text,
websites (i.e. pointing to and annotating documents on the
On 4/26/2010 7:19 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
Mark Elstonm_els...@comcast.net writes:
Dan,
The use of line numbers seems a little error prone since line numbers
can change dramatically by simply editing the file. If you edit one
section of a file, even if you update the line numbers for that
Hi Giles,
Giles Chamberlin wrote:
I've been using org-mode for some course work: write an essay about
your software including the interesting bits, add all source code in an
appendix.
#+INCLUDE solves the inclusion of source code files very nicely - I'm
guaranteed that my document includes
Sébastien Vauban wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com writes:
Hi Giles,
Giles Chamberlin wrote:
I've been using org-mode for some course work: write an essay about
your software including the interesting bits, add all source code in an
appendix.
#+INCLUDE solves the inclusion of source code files
On 4/26/2010 12:40 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
I'm considering investigating the following and would appreciate
comments on this idea. The aim is to make it easier to use Org-mode to
work pure code files which are *external to Org-mode* (i.e. this
proposal lies outside of the current org-babel
Mark Elston m_els...@comcast.net writes:
On 4/26/2010 12:40 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
I'm considering investigating the following and would appreciate
comments on this idea. The aim is to make it easier to use Org-mode to
work pure code files which are *external to Org-mode* (i.e. this
14 matches
Mail list logo
