Glad to hear you guys worked this out. I agree with Carsten that the image
itself is/was the preferred method.I don't agree that transparent images are
a problem but that's for a different topic/thread. It looks great on my end
guys!
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
>
On Jun 25, 2009, at 5:02 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
On Jun 25, 2009, at 4:28 PM, Sebastian Rose wrote:
Bastien writes:
Carsten Dominik writes:
What would be wrong with pulling the image out of the
background and making it directly clickable?
None, I've done this
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Jun 25, 2009, at 4:28 PM, Sebastian Rose wrote:
>
>> Bastien writes:
>>> Carsten Dominik writes:
>>>
What would be wrong with pulling the image out of the
background and making it directly clickable?
>>>
>>> None, I've done this.
>
> Great. I am also more
Hi Ross,
great post, thank you very much!
You have made me curious: What argumentation is used to estimate
the age of Myth at 7 years. I can't be the fossile record,
I guess :-) So I am wondering how something like this is figured out.
If you feel like putting background stuff about unic
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Feb 27, 2009, at 12:12 PM, Bastien wrote:
>
>> Carsten Dominik writes:
>>
>>> I guess it is something like an official logo, yes (even though
>>> some people don't like it, I have seen it being called
>>> "demasculinating"
>>> ...)
>>
>> Hehe... Since I picked up th
