Dear all,
since I subscribed to the maillist, the traffic increased enormously.
This is very nice, however, recently I got difficulties to filter throw
all the post searching for relevant topics for me. The babel project is
using already a [babel] tag, and other tags floating around
([PATCH],[
Torsten Wagner wrote:
Thinking of tags, I wonder why we use [Orgmode] since all mails
coming from emacs-orgmode(a)gnu.org which is a strong indicator
already.
Not sure I agree with splitting the list, but the [Orgmode] tag is
definitely superfluous. Who has a mail client that can't filter o
"Andrew J. Korty" writes:
tags seems to be:
- [babel] [1] or [Babel]
- [PATCH]
- [PATCH n/m]
- [Accepted] : means "patch accepted".
- Bug:
- MobileOrg
acronym tags[2]:
[OT]
[RFC]
and so on
[1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2009-11/msg00212.html
[2] http://www.gaarde.org
Torsten Wagner wrote:
> Thinking of tags, I wonder why we use
> [Orgmode] since all mails coming from emacs-orgmode(a)gnu.org which is
> a strong indicator already.
At least for me, the subject appears in my mail-reading pane so I can
see the tag, but the sender that appears is the original send
Andrew J. Korty wrote:
> Not sure I agree with splitting the list, but the [Orgmode] tag is
> definitely superfluous. Who has a mail client that can't filter on
> the List-Id field?
>
It may be superfluous for some (all?) mail clients, but it is not
supefluous for *me*. Some duplication/supefl
I have to use very large fonts, and tags present a huge problem for
that. I do, however, agree with the concept.
I would just like to propose that the tags be kept to just a few
letters. This allows reading more of the subject line.
Another point is that if important words are in the /beginning
Thanks for all the answers and discussions.
To summarise:
I guess nobody is interest to split the list. At least no dev mentioned a
need.
Tags are good but might need some guidance to use a certain set and possibly
shorten them wherever possible.
The issue with to long tag list is not only a proble
Hi Torsten,
Torsten Wagner writes:
> Using [Orgmode] as a tag on the orgmode list is an arguable point.
> Maybe the someone higher in the queue like to make a decision to
> shorten it to [Org].
I agreed this would be an improvement to use [Org].
If nobody have a strong objection, I'll make thi
