Hi Bastien, Richard,
thanks for the discussion!
Org-mode is plain text, so I don't have a good way to store which
sequence is
being used *between* sessions. Because of that, it seems to me that
it does
not make a lot of sense to store the sequence during the current
session, because
that
Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Richard G Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> Hey you mentionned in your first email that the manual explicitely said
>>> the two sets should have different keywords, so "bug" is a bit too much
>>> here :-)
>>
>> You misunderstand. When you try to switch i
Richard G Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Hey you mentionned in your first email that the manual explicitely said
>> the two sets should have different keywords, so "bug" is a bit too much
>> here :-)
>
> You misunderstand. When you try to switch it says "1/2" but wont
> switch. It should not
Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Richard G Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> At a guess internally a certain task is remembered via a task id or
>> something. If its not possible or not worth it, fine - no big deal. But
>> there is a bug in the latest in that it says there are two sets o
Richard G Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At a guess internally a certain task is remembered via a task id or
> something. If its not possible or not worth it, fine - no big deal. But
> there is a bug in the latest in that it says there are two sets of todo
> sequences but wont allow selection
Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Richard G Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> I think I need an example to see how such a piece of information could
>>> be used... can you provide one?
>>
>> I'm not sure I understand.
>>
>> I set the todo sequence for a particular task and it remembers,
Richard G Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think I need an example to see how such a piece of information could
>> be used... can you provide one?
>
> I'm not sure I understand.
>
> I set the todo sequence for a particular task and it remembers, for
> the life of the session, which is the s
Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Richard G Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> Mh... how do you "remember" what set you're using for en entry?
>>
>> I don't know the details of the elisp but I assume that for one open
>> file there is a "current sequence" variable? It is initialised to
Richard G Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Mh... how do you "remember" what set you're using for en entry?
>
> I don't know the details of the elisp but I assume that for one open
> file there is a "current sequence" variable? It is initialised to the
> first.
`org-todo-sets' is buffer-loca
Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Richard G Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> Seq1: k1 k2 k3 | k0
>>> Seq2: ka k1 kb kc | k0
>>>
>>> If a headline starts with k1, how Org would know what should be the next
>>> logical keyword? k2 or kb? For now, it uses k2, ignoring Seq2.
>>
>> Occam's
Richard G Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Seq1: k1 k2 k3 | k0
>> Seq2: ka k1 kb kc | k0
>>
>> If a headline starts with k1, how Org would know what should be the next
>> logical keyword? k2 or kb? For now, it uses k2, ignoring Seq2.
>
> Occam's razor. Simplest solution. The first one unless
Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Richard G Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Will it be possible to have same state names in different groups at
>> some stage? e.g Most "Subsequence" (to use a word from the info file)
>> would have a Done state I would think.
>
> Actually, you can alread
Richard G Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Will it be possible to have same state names in different groups at
> some stage? e.g Most "Subsequence" (to use a word from the info file)
> would have a Done state I would think.
Actually, you can already switch between sets of keywords if their
*fi
I have
#+SEQ_TODO: TODO(t) WAITING(w@) INPROGRESS(p@) | DONE(d) CANCELLED(x@)
DELEGATED(l@)
#+SEQ_TODO: TODO(t) | DONE(d)
but C-S-right doesn't switch to the new group. The status
line however shows it stays in "group 1/2" but I cant get it into group
2.
The documentation states that its bett
14 matches
Mail list logo