Re: [PATCH] org-agenda: Make sure skipping warning/delay days never increases their number

Bastien Guerry writes: > Ihor Radchenko writes: > >> Bastien, may you please check FSF records? > > Done, and confirmed things are in order. Welcome! Recorded. https://git.sr.ht/~bzg/worg/commit/4760468a -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at

Re: [PATCH] org-agenda: Make sure skipping warning/delay days never increases their number

Ihor Radchenko writes: > Bastien, may you please check FSF records? Done, and confirmed things are in order. Welcome! -- Bastien Guerry

Re: [PATCH] org-agenda: Make sure skipping warning/delay days never increases their number

Tim Ruffing writes: > On Tue, 2024-02-27 at 12:49 +, Ihor Radchenko wrote: >> However, your total contributions are now at the limit we can legally >> accept without FSF copyright assignment. >> Would you consider doing copyright paperwork as described in >>

Re: [PATCH] org-agenda: Make sure skipping warning/delay days never increases their number

On Tue, 2024-02-27 at 12:49 +, Ihor Radchenko wrote: > However, your total contributions are now at the limit we can legally > accept without FSF copyright assignment. > Would you consider doing copyright paperwork as described in > ? >

Re: [PATCH] org-agenda: Make sure skipping warning/delay days never increases their number

gally accept without FSF copyright assignment. Would you consider doing copyright paperwork as described in <https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.html#copyright>? > Subject: [PATCH] org-agenda: Make sure skipping warning/delay days never > increases their number Applied, onto main,

Re: [PATCH] org-agenda: Make sure skipping warning/delay days never increases their number

06b7144aa860b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tim Ruffing Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 10:57:29 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] org-agenda: Make sure skipping warning/delay days never increases their number * lisp/org-agenda.el (org-agenda-get-deadlines, org-agenda-get-scheduled): Use minimum of warning/delay

Re: [PATCH] org-agenda: Make sure skipping warning/delay days never increases their number

Tim Ruffing writes: >> Please do not remove arguments from the public functions. This may >> break >> code outside Org mode. >> > Hm, sure, I assumed it's okay for this niche thing. Can we deprecate > the argument somehow? We can do this - I do not see any code in the wild using the optional

Re: [PATCH] org-agenda: Make sure skipping warning/delay days never increases their number

00 2001 From: Tim Ruffing Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 10:57:29 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] org-agenda: Make sure skipping warning/delay days never increases their number * lisp/org-agenda.el (org-agenda-get-deadlines, org-agenda-get-scheduled): Use minimum of warning/delay days specified in time

Re: [PATCH] org-agenda: Make sure skipping warning/delay days never increases their number

Tim Ruffing writes: > The attached patch fixes the following bug: > > * Have a scheduled item that has also has a deadline with a cusom >prewarning cookie, e.g. <... -3d>. > * Set `org-agenda-skip-deadline-prewarning-if-scheduled' to 7 > > Then in the agenda, the item is shown already 7

[PATCH] org-agenda: Make sure skipping warning/delay days never increases their number

or delay period, but never extend it. Best, Tim From 5db0ac7115b86a12d1a2106eb54b07d339f69ed6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tim Ruffing Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 10:57:29 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] org-agenda: Make sure skipping warning/delay days never increases their number * lisp/org-agenda.el (org-agen