Tim Van den Langenbergh writes:
> I have updated the patch and enclosed it, feel free to drop a line if you
> notice anything else obviously missing.
Thanks!
Applied onto main as 06d08e6f3.
Best,
Ihor
Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
> Thanks! Since Felipe has no objections, your patch should be good to apply.
>
> Could you kindly add the geiser version info as a comment inside code?
> Commit message is an unlikely place to be checked regularly and be
> noticed as geiser is updated in future.
>
> Com
Tim Van den Langenbergh writes:
> I have taken the liberty of reformatting the patch you created for ob-scheme.
> You can find it enclosed.
Thanks! Since Felipe has no objections, your patch should be good to apply.
> If it is fine with you and the org-mode maintainers it can be applied as-is,
I'm Ok with this patch.
Haven't tested it myself, but looks good otherwise (probably Tim has
been using it for quite a while now)
Felipe
On 2022-04-23 09:29, Tim Van den Langenbergh wrote:
Felipe,
I have taken the liberty of reformatting the patch you created for ob-scheme.
You can find i
Felipe,
I have taken the liberty of reformatting the patch you created for ob-scheme.
You can find it enclosed.
If it is fine with you and the org-mode maintainers it can be applied as-is,
particularly since it is a tiny change.
I have also added some additional information to the commit message,
The patch appears to solve the real issue others already experience. See
https://list.orgmode.org/20220205221049.ymkzevpc2ivlxwbc@bob-mtu/T/#t
Dear Felipe,
Could you kindly update the patch as requested by Max?
Best,
Ihor
On 31/12/2021 02:01, Felipe Lema wrote:
On Thursday, 30 December 2021 22:50:20 +07 Max Nikulin wrote:
I would consider testing if `geiser-eval-region/wait' is bound and fallback to
`geiser-eval-region' otherwise.
I've wrapped an `if` to fallback to previous API before this breaking change in
On Thursday, 30 December 2021 22:50:20 +07 Max Nikulin wrote:
> On Wednesday, 29 December 2021 22.53.18 -03 Felipe Lema wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 29 December 2021 15.03.47 -03 Felipe Lema wrote:
> > > Sup, y'all
> > >
> > > The geiser package had a recent update in which `geiser-eval-region`
> > >
On 30/12/2021 08:53, Felipe Lema wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 December 2021 15.03.47 -03 Felipe Lema wrote:
The geiser package had a recent update in which `geiser-eval-region` behaves
like an async function and does not return evaluation result. In exchange, the
newly introduced `geiser-eval-regi
On Wednesday, 29 December 2021 15.03.47 -03 Felipe Lema wrote:
> Sup, y'all
>
> The geiser package had a recent update in which `geiser-eval-region` behaves
> like an async function and does not return evaluation result. In exchange,
> the newly introduced `geiser-eval-region/wait` does that now
Sup, y'all
The geiser package had a recent update in which `geiser-eval-region` behaves
like an async function and does not return evaluation result. In exchange, the
newly introduced `geiser-eval-region/wait` does that now.
I've attached a patch to update ob-scheme.el to reflect these changes.
11 matches
Mail list logo
