Re: [org-cite] add convention for direct commands, process for adding mappings to export processor(s)?

2021-10-10 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 4:41 PM Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > >> And if we were to add this, we'd still need to answer my first > >> question: when and how to add specific style/variant mappings to the > >> oc processors. > > It is possible to send a patch if it is something useful. Some > processors

Re: [org-cite] add convention for direct commands, process for adding mappings to export processor(s)?

2021-10-10 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, "Bruce D'Arcus" writes: >> The current list of styles and variants included in the oc export >> processors was a first step, with a goal to provide a solid starting >> point, and citations that are more-or-less portable across the >> backends. >> >> But that raises an obvious question: wh

Re: [org-cite] add convention for direct commands, process for adding mappings to export processor(s)?

2021-10-10 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
Just bumping this. Nicolas, in particular, any thoughts? On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 2:37 PM Bruce D'Arcus wrote: > > The current list of styles and variants included in the oc export > processors was a first step, with a goal to provide a solid starting > point, and citations that are more-or-less po

[org-cite] add convention for direct commands, process for adding mappings to export processor(s)?

2021-09-09 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
The current list of styles and variants included in the oc export processors was a first step, with a goal to provide a solid starting point, and citations that are more-or-less portable across the backends. But that raises an obvious question: what next? I'd like, for example, to suggest adding