Hi,
Qqwy/Wiebe-Marten writes:
> However, the LaTeX that is exported will still create normal `enumerize`
> lists that do /not/ show up as alphabetical but rather still use `1.`,
> `2.`, `3.` for numbering.
>
> I think this current behaviour is at the very least surprising, and
> possibly
I recall at least a few threads over the years that may be useful in
thinking about this issue. Here are the ones I quickly found again:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2013-06/msg00221.html
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2017-02/msg00052.html
Josiah
Qqwy/Wiebe-Marten writes:
> With `org-list-allow-alphabetical` on, it is possible to use syntax like
>
> `a.`, `b.`, `c.` to create lists.
>
> However, the LaTeX that is exported will still create normal `enumerize`
> lists that do /not/ show up as alphabetical but rather still use `1.`,
>
Dear org-mode community,
With `org-list-allow-alphabetical` on, it is possible to use syntax like
`a.`, `b.`, `c.` to create lists.
However, the LaTeX that is exported will still create normal `enumerize`
lists that do /not/ show up as alphabetical but rather still use `1.`,
`2.`, `3.` for
