Re: Can citeproc be installed without using MELPA? (was: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite)

2022-07-12 Thread András Simonyi
Dear All, On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 04:05, Ihor Radchenko wrote: > >> Then, I am wondering if parsebib can be added to ELPA or at least > >> non-GNU ELPA. The same can be said for all other dependencies of > >> citeproc.el and for citeproc itself. > non-GNU ELPA is also fine. The idea is to avoid

Re: Can citeproc be installed without using MELPA? (was: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite)

2022-07-10 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Joost Kremers writes: >>> looking into the source code (parsebib.el), the library seems to be >>> under a BSD-type license. > > Yes, it is. It's a single file and the license is at the top. I can add a > separate license file if that's necessary. It is not required. Just a bit confusing -

Re: Can citeproc be installed without using MELPA? (was: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite)

2022-07-10 Thread Joost Kremers
On Sun, Jul 10 2022, Ihor Radchenko wrote: > András Simonyi writes: > >>> The problem with parsebib is that it does not even have license >>> (I do not see any in https://github.com/joostkremers/parsebib). If >>> parsebib were a part of Emacs core or at least a part of ELPA, we would >>> also

Can citeproc be installed without using MELPA? (was: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite)

2022-07-10 Thread Ihor Radchenko
András Simonyi writes: >> The problem with parsebib is that it does not even have license >> (I do not see any in https://github.com/joostkremers/parsebib). If >> parsebib were a part of Emacs core or at least a part of ELPA, we would >> also be able to use it in Org core. > > looking into the