Sorry for the late reply. I haven't had much time these days to
keep up with the list...
Max Nikulin writes:
> It was long time ago...
>
> On 18/02/2022 07:47, Juan Manuel Macías wrote:
>> Otherwise, if you export to LaTeX with pandoc (v. 2.14.2), the result is
>> (to my surprise) correct:
>> #+b
It was long time ago...
On 18/02/2022 07:47, Juan Manuel Macías wrote:
Otherwise, if you export to LaTeX with pandoc (v. 2.14.2), the result is
(to my surprise) correct:
#+begin_src sh :results latex
str="/lorem /ipsum/ dolor/"
pandoc -f org -t latex <<< $str
#+end_src
#+RESULTS:
#+begin_expor
On 18/02/2022 19:31, Juan Manuel Macías wrote:
Max Nikulin writes:
So formally this feature of pandoc is a bug (due to different kind of
parser). It is the reason why a corpus of tests should exist in a
format that can be easily imported from various programming languages.
Your conclusions se
Hi Maxim,
Max Nikulin writes:
> So formally this feature of pandoc is a bug (due to different kind of
> parser). It is the reason why a corpus of tests should exist in a
> format that can be easily imported from various programming languages.
Your conclusions seem logical to me. It may sound a b
On 18/02/2022 07:47, Juan Manuel Macías wrote:
Otherwise, if you export to LaTeX with pandoc (v. 2.14.2), the result is
(to my surprise) correct:
str="/lorem /ipsum/ dolor/"
pandoc -f org -t latex <<< $str
\emph{lorem \emph{ipsum} dolor}
2.5-3build2 from Ubuntu-20.04 works in the same way.
I
Hi all,
Sorry in advance if this may sound too trivial, imprecise or naive: it's
just for my curiosity, as I've recently been doing some tests with Pandoc
and I've seen something that has caught my attention.
It is known that LaTeX-style nested emphases of the same category are
not possible in Or
