What is the canonical difference between org-insert-structure-template
and org-tempo then?
I think, emacs skeleton libraries (M-x info-display-manual RET
autotype RET) support placing the point (with a "_" marker)
ср, 30 окт. 2019 г. в 00:43, Berry, Charles :
>
> `org-tempo' is the replacement.
`org-tempo' is the replacement. It is mentioned in the docstring for
`org-structure-template-alist'.
Here is what I have in my `emacs-init.org' file:
(The letter `p' denotes where point should land. `n' is a newline. See the
docstring for `tempo-define-template' for more details.)
In the version 8 of org-mode you could indicate where to put the point
after the template is expanded. In the template
(list "p" "#begin_src plantuml :file ? :export both \n#end_src"),
after the template is expanded, the point would be located after
:file, whereas in the template (list "SO"
On Tuesday, 29 Oct 2019 at 15:57, Vladimir Nikishkin wrote:
> The problem is that for ob-plantuml I need the value of point be right
> after the :file header parameter, because plantuml always requires a
> file name.
I don't see this in my configuration. But it could be that I do not
understand
Hello, everyone.
I recently updated to org 9.2 from org-melpa, and I have the following issue:
I use org with org-babel to write a book with many examples and illustrations.
I use ob-plantuml and ob-scheme in particular.
The problem is that for ob-plantuml I need the value of point be right
