H no more entries. :-(
Anyway, here is my entry, just to prove that N is 8 (at least for now),
and also to show that perl can function as a write-only language.
- Carsten
#!/usr/bin/perl -p
# taskpaper-to-org converter including #+TAGS setup in 239 bytes
/^(\t*)-(.*?)((@\w+ *)*)$/;
On Apr 3, 2008, at 5:14 PM, Rick Moynihan wrote:
I'm not convinced of it's worth either. But having more org
files out in the wild would be nice :-) It's a shame Taskpaper
doesn't just use a subset of org-mode's syntax really.
R.
Well, indeed not exactly the same, but very close. A way
On Apr 3, 2008, at 4:26 PM, Manish wrote:
Not worth it, IMHO. Thank $deity, Carsten and others that contribute
to org-mode do not /have to/ do it. I wish they would spend their
time having fun instead of worrying about increasing market share.
I am certainly doing exactly that.
- Carsten
Rick Moynihan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For example, you *might* be able to convince your mum to use Taskpaper
but there's no way she'd ever use Emacs and Org-mode.
I'd prefer my mum not to use or send me todo-lists!
Even with a Org syntax.
I'd been 20 years now that I try to convince her
Eddward DeVilla wrote:
I guess the best way to address this problem might be to document up
front that org-mode uses a simple, readable, text only format and that
all of the features can be used independently of each other but that
they do interact well together. (It's been a while since I've
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Rick Moynihan wrote:
Eddward DeVilla wrote:
I guess the best way to address this problem might be to document up
front that org-mode uses a simple, readable, text only format and that
all of the features can be used independently of each other
Manish wrote:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Rick Moynihan wrote:
Eddward DeVilla wrote:
I guess the best way to address this problem might be to document up
front that org-mode uses a simple, readable, text only format and that
all of the features can be used independently
To be honest when i first read it i thought it was a good idea. I saw
it as an extension of your splitting the big org file into the smaller
include files in the git repo.
What people miss when they are new to Org-mode is this:
Don't try to set up the final task managing system from the
Manish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Rick Moynihan wrote:
Emacs might be Org's greatest ally, but it's also simultaneously
Org's biggest problem. My point here, isn't to bash Emacs, it is
what it is, and it's damn good... But with apologies to RMS, it
Rick Moynihan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's a shame Taskpaper doesn't just use a subset of org-mode's syntax
really.
What would it be useful for? Using both TaskPaper and org-mode? I
think people using TaskPaper are not likely to use org-mode and vice
versa.
I tend to agree some of the
Bastien wrote:
Rick Moynihan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's a shame Taskpaper doesn't just use a subset of org-mode's syntax
really.
What would it be useful for? Using both TaskPaper and org-mode? I
think people using TaskPaper are not likely to use org-mode and vice
versa.
No. Like
Joel J. Adamson wrote:
Manish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Rick Moynihan wrote:
Emacs might be Org's greatest ally, but it's also simultaneously
Org's biggest problem. My point here, isn't to bash Emacs, it is
what it is, and it's damn good... But
Rick Moynihan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
3. Offer some kind of Easy org installation.
- Effectively a distro of Emacs tailored to Org-mode.
- Ship with an installer.
- Give it a catchier product name.
IMO making sure that Emacs-W32 and Aquamacs always ship a current
version of
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 09:26:49AM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
Dear all,
the recent discussion about Taskpaper in the thread started
by Clint Laskowski has made me realize how much we have lost
out way with Org-mode. Org-mode was once a compact and
easy tool just like taskpaper. In
Egli Christian (KIRO 433) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the recent discussion about Taskpaper in the thread started by
Clint Laskowski has made me realize how much we have lost out way
with Org-mode. Org-mode was once a compact and easy tool just like
taskpaper. In fact, looking at the features
My thoughtful suggestion has become the brunt of an April Fool's Joke?
I have half a mind to report you all to the Productivity Police! Fine!
I'm going back to paper and pencil for to-do lists, and mail, too!
We'll see how you like that!
:-)
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 2:26 AM, Carsten Dominik [EMAIL
the recent discussion about Taskpaper in the thread started
by Clint Laskowski has made me realize how much we have lost
out way with Org-mode. Org-mode was once a compact and
easy tool just like taskpaper. In fact, looking at the
features of taskpaper, one might think that they had an
--- Bastien Guerry [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
what would be
Emacs without its tutorial? A closed door.
So I believe this would be a *huge* benefit for Org
to have its own tutorial.
Is it an april fool? [°]=,=
Let's assume it isn't.
I disagree since I belive the manual is already
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 12:28:37PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
Dear all,
I hope that you will all forgive me my little joke. It worked so
well because there is a certain amount of truth in the matter, of
course, and I would like to address this in a more serious
manner.
You got me.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 6:20 AM, Clint Laskowski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My thoughtful suggestion has become the brunt of an April Fool's Joke?
I have half a mind to report you all to the Productivity Police! Fine!
I'm going back to paper and pencil for to-do lists, and mail, too!
We'll see
To be honest, if I were looking for an outliner today as I was when I
found org-mode, I might have been scared off. Org-mode has gotten
very big. But as you said, the easy things are easy. There are a
great many feature in org-mode that I have not used nor have I had
time to learn to use. They
On Apr 1, 2008, at 5:52 PM, Eddward DeVilla wrote:
To be honest, if I were looking for an outliner today as I was when I
found org-mode, I might have been scared off. Org-mode has gotten
very big.
Sometimes I am wondering: what do you mean when it has gotten big?
How do you measure it?
22 matches
Mail list logo
