Re: [Orgmode] Difference between org-footnote.el and footnote.el

2010-10-21 Thread Charles Philip Chan
Nick Dokos writes: > How does footnote.el find the signature? I presume by looking for the line "--" which precedes the signature. Charles -- "I'd crawl over an acre of 'Visual This++' and 'Integrated Development That' to get to gcc, Emacs, and gdb. Thank you." (By Vance Petree, Virginia Pow

Re: [Orgmode] Difference between org-footnote.el and footnote.el

2010-10-21 Thread Nick Dokos
Tassilo Horn wrote: > > BTW suggest to replace the common footnote by the org's footnotes, remove > > the > > prefix then, leave some aliases in org-mode for backward-compatibility. > > Well, I don't have a strong opinion on that. But currently > org-footnote.el is not very good when writing

Re: [Orgmode] Difference between org-footnote.el and footnote.el

2010-10-21 Thread Tassilo Horn
Tassilo Horn writes: >> common footnote.el was never able to detect if a file opened has >> already footnote inside. Didn't check that for some month now... > > Yes, I've just tried that. Create a file with footnotes, save it, kill > the buffer, find it again, add another footnote, and it starts

Re: [Orgmode] Difference between org-footnote.el and footnote.el

2010-10-21 Thread Tassilo Horn
Andreas Röhler writes: Hi Andreas, >> Oh, I was pretty sure that org-footnote.el is only a wrapper around >> the original footnote.el that comes with emacs, but looking at the >> code it seems to be a completely separate facility. >> >> It says to have "better support for resuming editing" than

Re: [Orgmode] Difference between org-footnote.el and footnote.el

2010-10-21 Thread Andreas Röhler
[ ... ] Oh, I was pretty sure that org-footnote.el is only a wrapper around the original footnote.el that comes with emacs, but looking at the code it seems to be a completely separate facility. It says to have "better support for resuming editing" than footnote.el but be less configurable. Ca