On 10/9/20 3:24 PM, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote:
Do you receive double mails? Doesn't it bother you?
Normally I would agree with you, but there is a very simple explanation
for this particular list: This mailing list is very high traffic and
people can't pay attention all the time.
I automatica
On Friday, 30 Oct 2020 at 12:30, Russell Adams wrote:
> Welcome to the next stage of Eternal September.
;-)
$ sdate
Fri 9922 Sep 11:58:07 GMT 1993
$
--
: Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50, Org release_9.4-61-ga88806.dirty
On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 10:10:41PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> For mailing lists which allow posting by non-subscribers (this is one),
Org-mode is a subscriber only mailing list. It does not allow
non-members to post for spam prevention.
If you did not have to subscribe to the mailing list w
Tim Cross writes:
> Eric S Fraga writes:
>
>> On Sunday, 11 Oct 2020 at 16:35, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote:
>>> From my point of view mailinglists and web-forums are a step back in
>>> usability and efficiency.
>>
>> On this, we can definitely agree! Newsgroups are still the best way to
>> have the
Eric S Fraga writes:
> On Sunday, 11 Oct 2020 at 16:35, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote:
>> From my point of view mailinglists and web-forums are a step back in
>> usability and efficiency.
>
> On this, we can definitely agree! Newsgroups are still the best way to
> have these types of conversations.
On Sunday, 11 Oct 2020 at 16:35, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote:
> From my point of view mailinglists and web-forums are a step back in
> usability and efficiency.
On this, we can definitely agree! Newsgroups are still the best way to
have these types of conversations.
> But there is just one exception
On 2020-10-11 14:58 Eric S Fraga wrote:
> the org mode mailing list is open,
I never understood the benefit of an "open" mailinglist. But I am not
the center of the universe. ;)
> I am not trying to be snarky or rude
Your are not. Everything is fine.
> For other lists, the situation could
> be
On Saturday, 10 Oct 2020 at 10:53, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote:
> IMO the problem is the list user that "Answers to all".
But this is *not* the problem as the org mode mailing list is open,
i.e. anybody can post whether they subscribe or not. Hence, replying to
all is actually the safest option.
The
On 2020-10-10 20:57 Maxim Nikulin wrote:
> openssl s_client --starttls sieve -connect posteo.de:sieve
>
> "IMPLEMENTATION" "Dovecot Pigeonhole"
Great!
I knew and intensiv used "sieve" on my posteo.de Server.
But sieve-Support was unofficial and they simply deactivated it without
reason or any n
On 2020-10-09, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 10:10:41PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 09:24:34PM +0200, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote:
>> > Hi,
>
> [...]
>
>> There is no clear-cut answer to that [...]
>
> You might also want to experiment with setting the
10.10.2020 15:53, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote:
On 2020-10-10 15:03 Maxim Nikulin wrote:
1. Use "duplicate" sieve extension.
[..]
2. Just add filter
[..]
This are workarounds but not solutions.
Certainly.
IMO the problem is the list user that "Answers to all".
Why should I modify my system b
On 2020-10-10 11:10 wrote:
> I made myself quite a bit of work to explain to you what you can do.
> Even with a link to mailman docs on how you can set your subscription
> settings.
You did not. You wrote
> experiment with setting the Mail-Followup-To: header [1]
and pointed to
https://cr.yp.to
On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 10:57:26AM +0200, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote:
> There is a "Sender:" header entry I can filter on.
>
> But I do not setup anything because I don't case the problem.
I don't unerstand this sentence.
> Btw: It is nice that all of you using Gnus and (maybe) a local
> mailserver
On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 10:53:08AM +0200, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote:
> On 2020-10-10 15:03 Maxim Nikulin wrote:
> > 1. Use "duplicate" sieve extension.
> > [..]
> >
> > 2. Just add filter
> > [..]
>
> This are workarounds but not solutions.
>
> IMO the problem is the list user that "Answers to al
There is a "Sender:" header entry I can filter on.
But I do not setup anything because I don't case the problem.
Btw: It is nice that all of you using Gnus and (maybe) a local
mailserver with powerfull filtering. I don't.
It is kind of a religious problem. :D
Isn't there a setting on the mailin
On 2020-10-10 15:03 Maxim Nikulin wrote:
> 1. Use "duplicate" sieve extension.
> [..]
>
> 2. Just add filter
> [..]
This are workarounds but not solutions.
IMO the problem is the list user that "Answers to all".
Why should I modify my system because another one make errors?
10.10.2020 02:24, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote:
So tell me please how do you handle this "problem"? Or do I setup
something wrong with my list account?
From my point of view, the problem is that most of you press "Reply
All" when answering to a mailinglist posting. But that is IMO wrong
because you
I do use reply-to-all (gnus-style), but I don't notice doubles. It might be
because I have my client set up to do deduping, though.
writes:
> Hi,
>
> I had this discussion in several mailinglists but gave up.
>
> But I am suprised to see this phenomenon in a emacs related (means:
> "super nerdy
On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 10:10:41PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 09:24:34PM +0200, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote:
> > Hi,
[...]
> There is no clear-cut answer to that [...]
You might also want to experiment with setting the Mail-Followup-To:
header [1] in your mails to the l
On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 09:24:34PM +0200, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had this discussion in several mailinglists but gave up.
>
> But I am suprised to see this phenomenon in a emacs related (means:
> "super nerdy") mailinglist, too.
>
> So tell me please how do you handle this "problem
Hi,
I had this discussion in several mailinglists but gave up.
But I am suprised to see this phenomenon in a emacs related (means:
"super nerdy") mailinglist, too.
So tell me please how do you handle this "problem"? Or do I setup
something wrong with my list account?
From my point of view, the
21 matches
Mail list logo
