-recenter-compilation-buffer
makeinfo-recenter-compilation-buffer
Wrote /home/speck/texte/20060705-an-makeinfo.txt
Press Return to bury the buffer list
Result: /home/speck/emacs/lispref/text.texi
Result: nil [3 times]
Result: 1 (#o1, #x1, ?\C-a) [2 times]
Result: 0 (#o0, #x0, ?\C-@)
Result: 4639
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Johan Bockgård) writes:
* eval-current-buffer has been obsoleted and replaced by eval-buffer.
Some places in the Emacs and Emacs Lisp manuals refer to both
eval-current-buffer and eval-buffer, some refer only to
eval-current-buffer.
i've fixed those sites to use
Nick Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Nick,
It might be fine for personalising Emacs but not a general package.
Your construction above adds the function to the hook at the end. So,
for example, if that's in a buffer that I'm using for debugging, the
tooltips will display translations of
Eli Zaretskii [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 13:29:53 -0400
Is there any reason why someone contributing code should know about
FOR-RELEASE? I do not see any.
Contributors should
Is there any reason why someone contributing code should know about
FOR-RELEASE? I do not see any.
Contributors should be aware of the burning issues, if we want them to
spend energy where we think it's most useful.
CONTRIBUTE should mention that _after_ checking out the
It might be fine for personalising Emacs but not a general package.
Your construction above adds the function to the hook at the end. So,
for example, if that's in a buffer that I'm using for debugging, the
tooltips will display translations of my variable names rather than
their
texinfo-format-buffer is pretty much obsolete; we use makeinfo
instead. However, Bob Chassell sometimes maintains
texinfo-format-buffer. So I forwarded these reports to him.
___
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
[None of my previous messages got through to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Let's try these other addresses.
Please tell me which address succeeds and then please have Emacs set
the `mail-default-reply-to' variable so I don't try sending them to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks!]
As for your latest message,
I see. But I guess we could ask package maintainers like Romain to include
files like this, if it's appropriate.
We could say that. Where would we put the statement, so they would
see it?
___
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
From: Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 13:03:52 -0400
Thanks. Would you like to change the manual(s), too?
i have made changes in man/{building,faq}.texi and
lispref/{edebug,loading}.texi similarly. these were
chosen based on M-x find-grep eval-current-buffer.
In GNU Emacs 23.0.0.3 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.8.18)
of 2006-06-23 on exponent
X server distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.7000
configured using `configure
'--prefix=/usr/local/stow/emacs-unicode-xft.20060623' '--with-xpm'
'--with-jpeg' '--with-tiff' '--with-gif'
Could the problem that users unsaved data are not saved on w32 in this
situation be put in FOR-RELEASE? I think it is a serious bug.
The user has requested a shutdown of the system, without saving their
data first. How is it a bug that Emacs respects their wishes?
It's worth considering that
Richard Stallman schrieb:
makeinfo --fill-column=70 /home/speck/emacs/lispref/text.texi
That file is not valid input, since it is just part of a manual.
Try it with elisp.texi instead.
With the complete elisp.texi it will work. Just took
that file, as you asked
Would someone please
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kim F. Storm)
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 10:31:43 +0200
CONTRIBUTE should mention that _after_ checking out the sources,
the user should read the INSTALL.CVS file.
I don't see how INSTALL.CVS is relevant to
From: Nick Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 20:49:55 +1200
Cc: Eli Zaretskii [EMAIL PROTECTED], emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
The admin directory has files which go way beyond the needs of the average
contributor.
Those files aren't documented anywhere, and aren't included in
The admin directory has files which go way beyond the needs of the average
contributor.
Those files aren't documented anywhere, and aren't included in the
distribution. So, if we don't mention them, there's no chance an
average contributor will learn about them. What's the harm of
On Wed, 05 Jul 2006 13:25:12 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dr. Carsten
Bormann) said:
While typing input (apparently often related to file/process
operations, such as minibuffer completions of file names), emacs
occasionally (say, once a day in heavy usage) hangs and uses high
CPU (most of
The INSTALL file says that
Compiling with LessTif or Motif causes a standard File Selection
Dialog to pop up when you type C-x C-f and similar commands.
but I believe that dialogs are used only for mouse commands, not for
keyboard commands.
--
Johan Bockgård
I see. But I guess we could ask package maintainers like Romain to
include files like this, if it's appropriate.
We could say that. Where would we put the statement, so they would
see it?
Romain has added the file to make-dist which presumably determines which files
get
19 matches
Mail list logo
