Update of /services/emacs-rcp/cvsroot/rcp/lisp
In directory bonny:/tmp/cvs-serv4121
Modified Files:
rcp.el
Log Message:
Added rlogin method to multi connection method.
Update of /services/emacs-rcp/cvsroot/rcp/lisp
In directory bonny:/tmp/cvs-serv4132
Modified Files:
rcp.el
Log Message:
Removed superfluous check.
Update of /services/emacs-rcp/cvsroot/rcp/lisp
In directory bonny:/tmp/cvs-serv4448
Modified Files:
rcp.el
Log Message:
Bug fix for arguments for `su' command.
Allow `su' command as hop in multi-hop connection method.
Update of /services/emacs-rcp/cvsroot/rcp/lisp
In directory bonny:/tmp/cvs-serv4531
Modified Files:
rcp.el
Log Message:
Bug fix when writing files using multi-hop method.
I have started to implement this. It will be a few commits before it
is finished, though. Watch me code... ;-)
kai
--
The birch trees fly way too low these days.
"KG" == Kai Großjohann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
KG Okay, I can understand that. Hm. This should be easy enough to do.
KG But you talk about authentication timeout. What happens when the
KG shell has been idle for a while?
Sorry, my fault. If you are going to just do sudo -u
There has been talk about setting up interactive shells with more
intelligence. The discussion was specifically about tset, IIRC.
What I could do is this: I could set up an alist of regex/action pairs
and rather than expecting just a shell prompt, I expect any of the
regexes in that alist. And
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark A. Hershberger) writes:
[...] If you are going to just do sudo -u user bash, then you
really shouldn't need to worry about the authentication
timeout.[...]
Good.
Hmm... Well, if there is that much need for `cd', then let's avoid the
second form for now.
`cd' is
Right now, I have code like this:
(setq found (re-search-forward "\\(foo\\)\\|\\(bar\\)"))
(unless found (error ...))
(when (match-string 2)
;; found bar
)
Of course, this fails badly if foo contains any \\(...\\) pairs.
So, what's the best way to do this? Count the number of \\(...\\)
- Emacs 21 is coming up which might mean quite a few changes.
Should I split in two branches, or should I try to support all
Emacsen in one branch?
It would be nice to have everything together. But if keeping everything
together adds too much code (more than, say, 5% of
I've been thinking about default login names. Right now, deep down in
the bowels of rcp.el, every file name with a missing login name is
rewritten to put in the local user name instead.
I was thinking of allowing nil as user name everywhere, with the
semantics that the user name is then not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark A. Hershberger) writes:
It would also be very useful to have a `sudo' method availible and
would probably be very similar to the `su' methods.
I have never used sudo. I know that it can be used to restrict which
commands can be executed as root by another user, but
"KG" == Kai Großjohann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
KG Hm. Suppose /xyzzy is a directory only readable by root, and
KG you have sudo permissions to list the directory. Can you use
KG sudo to get the same output that `cd /xyzzy ; ls -lda a*'
KG would produce? Note that `ld -lda
13 matches
Mail list logo
