On Thu, 25 May 2000, Kai Großjohann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
"Daniel Pittman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 24 May 2000, Kai Großjohann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What should rcp-handle-file-newer-than-file-p do if it is not
possible to return the right information?
Fall back
"Daniel Pittman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
NB: Kai, the Emacs LISP reference specifically states that automatic
coding system detection for asynchronous subprocesses is, er,
unreliable. It claims that the detection is done on each chunk of the
input, which may not be reliable...
Whee. Hm.
It seems to me, on consideration, that the VC integration of RCP could
very well be split out into a separate file from the main body of the
code, and automatically loaded if/when VC is.
This makes sense to me because, aside from anything else, it seems
awfully rude to (require 'vc) at the top
"Tom Roche" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kai Großjohann [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/24/00 7:28:28 AM
and when you reach this point, switch to the *rcp/foo* buffer, erase
it,
C-x k *rcp/k [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
No! Erasing the buffer is not the same as deleting it. I meant C-x h C-w.
kai
--
I
Update of /services/emacs-rcp/cvsroot/rcp/texi
In directory bonny:/tmp/cvs-serv9980
Modified Files:
rcp.texi
Log Message:
Documentation updates:
* Added notes on the cannonical web location of the document.
* Note the mailing list and archive in the top node.
* Add a download link to
"Pete" == Pete Forman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I did realise that but we are not going to be able to express all the
functionality in a short name. The most common use of the UNIX su
That's whay I suggested `shellfs' since it lays a filesystem on top of any
kind of shell access, whether
Update of /services/emacs-rcp/cvsroot
In directory lucy:/export/home/grossjoh/work/emacs-rcp
Added Files:
.cvsignore
Log Message:
*** empty log message ***
"Tom" == Tom Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How about FBT: "flying birch tree" :-) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd vote for Kai Großjohann's baby (aka KGB), then.
Stefan
Jeff Senn [EMAIL PROTECTED] 23 May 2000 12:34:06 -0400
What do folks tend to use on windows for secure (client) file access
in emacs?
Is there an efs compatible option? (ssl-ftp for windows or
something?)
Tom Roche 5/24/00 11:14PM
Check out "the package formerly known as RCP"
Kai Großjohann [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/25/00 12:18:39 PM
[ssh into the remote host, /bin/sh, and enter the following, minus
the ASCII art:]
/
| $ PS1='
| /
| '; PS2=''; PS3=''
|
| /
\
You enter the first three lines. I'm guessing that for you, the empty
fourth line is
"Tom Roche" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
$ # Waiting 30s for `unset MAIL MAILCHECK MAILPATH'
$ $ PS1='
/
'; PS2=''; PS3=''
# Waiting for remote `/bin/sh' to come up...
/
[[INCOMPLETE!]]
/
[[INCOMPLETE!]]
Hm. Try the following on the remote host:
/
| $
"Tom Roche" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Re information: are [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] the same thing? I'm assuming one
alias the other.
Yes, ls6 is a cname for amaunet. And we seem to be unable to
configure sendmail not to replace cnames with the host name...
ls6 means `chair
Update of /services/emacs-rcp/cvsroot/rcp/lisp
In directory lucy:/export/home/grossjoh/work/emacs-rcp/rcp/lisp
Modified Files:
rcp.el
Log Message:
rcp-open-connection-setup-interactive-shell: Try to intuit the coding
systems for process I/O based on some shell command. Behavior for
Update of /services/emacs-rcp/cvsroot/rcp
In directory lucy:/export/home/grossjoh/work/emacs-rcp/rcp
Modified Files:
Makefile
Log Message:
Add target for installing HTML file.
It is kinda difficult to vote if the number of candidates is equal to
the number of votes...
So, I'd like to suggest ramp now. It even got three votes.
[ ] Yea
[ ] Nay
kai
--
I like BOTH kinds of music.
Daniel Pittman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems to me, on consideration, that the VC integration of RCP could
very well be split out into a separate file from the main body of the
code, and automatically loaded if/when VC is.
In principle, this is not a bad idea, but changes in this area
When the remote shell has come up, I intend to send some command to
the remote end, then have MULE analyze the output to set the process
output coding system. Does that sound reasonable?
I think doing `ls -l /' should be fairly safe. This might contain
dates in the local language and it
So it seems that choosing a name based on functionality is difficult.
How about a name that's ... just a name?
Kai Großjohann [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/24/00 7:28:28 AM
Beware of flying birch trees.
How about FBT: "flying birch tree" :-) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kai Großjohann writes:
Pete Forman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Furthermore, The Package Still Known As Rcp is not itself a
filesystem. It is a means of accessing other filesystems. I
suppose you could call it a filesystem wrapper.
But there is a precedence: EFS. Also `FS'.
Kai Großjohann [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/24/00 7:28:28 AM
and when you reach this point, switch to the *rcp/foo* buffer,
erase it,
"Tom Roche" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
C-x k *rcp/k [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
Kai Großjohann [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/25/00 6:13:39 AM
No! Erasing the buffer is not the same as
"Tom Roche" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| $ PS1='
| /
| '; PS2=''; PS3=''
|
| /
| @
with cursor at '@'. The empty fourth line _is_ there.
So you get the same that I get. So it should work for you. But it
doesn't. I'm mystified.
Does anybody out there have any idea what
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Großjohann) writes:
I'll just do it and you tell me if it works... :-)
Okay, go for it. New version in CVS and on ftp server. I hope I
didn't break anything.
kai
--
I like BOTH kinds of music.
On Thu, 25 May 2000, Kai Großjohann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
"Daniel Pittman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
NB: Kai, the Emacs LISP reference specifically states that automatic
coding system detection for asynchronous subprocesses is, er,
unreliable. It claims that the detection is done on
23 matches
Mail list logo
