Re: problem with remote version control

2001-03-17 Thread Kai Großjohann
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Tom Roche wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 16 Mar 2001 23:23:26 +0100 > > On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Tom Roche wrote: >>> now that remote compilation works, next on my agenda is remote >>> version control. > >> Well, the idea with CVS is that you have your own working >> directory, whi

TRAMP, uid, VC

2001-03-17 Thread Tom_Roche
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Tom Roche wrote: >> If I open a CVSed file in tramp, e.g. (broken for mail) >> /r@t:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/local/dev/tlroche/webassign/ >> ScoreAnalysis.pm >> I see >> (CPerl CVS:17061:1.12 Abbrev) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 17 Mar 2001 13:32:21 +0100 > 17061 is your user id on the rem

remote VC, profiles

2001-03-17 Thread Tom_Roche
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Tom Roche wrote: >> I get >>> *vc-diff* >>> /bin/ksh: cvs: not found >> How do I make ksh find cvs? Also, just wondering: why ksh? (A quick hand-waving explanation will probably suffice :-) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 17 Mar 2001 13:32:21 +0100 > Just add directories to tramp-remot

.sh_history problem

2001-03-17 Thread Tom_Roche
Just now I was working in TRAMP (after corresponding about it--I seem to be trapped in a tramp-centric universe :-) when I was unable to save changes to a file. After thrashing about for a bit, I found * I was over quota for filespace on the device * ... due to /ncsu/tlroche> ls -alFS tota

Re: remote VC, profiles

2001-03-17 Thread Kai Großjohann
On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Tom Roche wrote: > On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Tom Roche wrote: >>> I get > *vc-diff* /bin/ksh: cvs: not found > >>> How do I make ksh find cvs? > > Also, just wondering: why ksh? (A quick hand-waving explanation will > probably suffice :-) Well, Tramp works by sendin

Re: tramp ($Id: tramp.el,v 2.9 2001/03/14 21:46:41 grossjoh Exp $); dired can't find ~ in AFS

2001-03-17 Thread Kai Großjohann
I think Tramp fails on all symlinks, but I haven't had time to investigate this, yet. If this is the problem, then at least I know that there is only one but, not two. kai -- Be indiscrete. Do it continuously.

Re: .sh_history problem

2001-03-17 Thread Kai Großjohann
On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Tom Roche wrote: > * is tramp writing to this file? No, Tramp itself is not writing to the file, but I think the shell is. If you read the documentation for ksh and tell me how to turn off the history, I'll put that code in Tramp. (There is already code for turning off the

Re: TRAMP, uid, VC

2001-03-17 Thread Kai Großjohann
On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Tom Roche wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 17 Mar 2001 13:32:21 +0100 > >> Tramp does not know that this is your user id. There is a problem >> with interoperation between VC and Tramp in this regard. Not sure >> what to do about it. > > Ach. Thanks anyway, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wel

Re: .sh_history problem

2001-03-17 Thread Tom_Roche
On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Tom Roche wrote: >> * is tramp writing to this file? [EMAIL PROTECTED] 17 Mar 2001 21:18:10 +0100 > No, Tramp itself is not writing to the file, but I think the shell > is. If you read the documentation for ksh and tell me how to turn off > the history, I'll put that code in

Re: .sh_history problem

2001-03-17 Thread Kai Großjohann
On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Tom Roche wrote: > On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Tom Roche wrote: >>> * is tramp writing to this file? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 17 Mar 2001 21:18:10 +0100 >> No, Tramp itself is not writing to the file, but I think the shell >> is. If you read the documentation for ksh and tell me how

Re: .sh_history problem

2001-03-17 Thread Tom_Roche
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 18 Mar 2001 00:11:04 +0100 > Excuse me if this is very stupid, but why don't you just read the > man page of _your_ ksh? My impression is, and I have heard from folks who should know, that documentation on local (AFSspace, anyway) packages is often way downlevel (and is sometime

Re: password reading, was: tramp-2.9

2001-03-17 Thread Daniel Pittman
On 16 Mar 2001, Kai Großjohann wrote: > On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Tom Roche wrote: > >> and I know it works, but I don't understand why. However, _that_ is >> not my immediate concern. Instead, I'd like to know: can TRAMP be >> hacked to get a password itself, and pass it to the client via its >> args

Re: TRAMP, uid, VC

2001-03-17 Thread Daniel Pittman
On 17 Mar 2001, Kai Großjohann wrote: > On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Tom Roche wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 17 Mar 2001 13:32:21 +0100 >> >>> Tramp does not know that this is your user id. There is a problem >>> with interoperation between VC and Tramp in this regard. Not sure >>> what to do about it.