"Daniel Pittman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hrm. In that case, since it seems to be biting me, I might put in some
> effort to learning how MULE works and implementing it properly for RCP.
> Assuming you don't object, of course.
I would be very happy if you were to help with that. Thanks!
k
On Sun, 21 May 2000, Kai Großjohann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Still, I don't want to commit this without knowing that it at least
>> works for a few people, and I really /don't/ understand how the MULE
>> integration has been done in rcp.
>
> W
Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Still, I don't want to commit this without knowing that it at least
> works for a few people, and I really /don't/ understand how the MULE
> integration has been done in rcp.
Well, that makes two of us...
MULE comes into play in different places, but
The attached patch makes the connection setup work for me under
XEmacs/MULE. Simply put, I presume that the system I am talking to is
going to have dos-style line enders, and set the coding system for
reading to match that.
This shouldn't hurt anything under non-MULE code, being as it binds a
var
