[Emacsweblogs] Re: New xml-rpc.el and weblogger.el

2009-09-18 Thread Leo
2009/9/16 Mark A. Hershberger m...@everybody.org: Leo sdl@gmail.com writes: Hrm… That should actually be taken care of in the new xml-rpc.el (see the end of the file, where timezone-parse-date is conditionally defined. Or it should be. I see. I guess, for some reason, that didn't

[Emacsweblogs] Re: New xml-rpc.el and weblogger.el

2009-09-16 Thread Mark A. Hershberger
Leo sdl@gmail.com writes: Hrm… That should actually be taken care of in the new xml-rpc.el (see the end of the file, where timezone-parse-date is conditionally defined. Or it should be. I see. I guess, for some reason, that didn't happen and the original timezone-parse-date from

[Emacsweblogs] Re: New xml-rpc.el and weblogger.el

2009-09-15 Thread Leo
On 2009-09-13 07:57 +0100, Mark A. Hershberger wrote: Thank you all for your great bug reports. I installed a MT weblog as If you were experiencing problems in the past, please get the following versions and notify me of any new problems: xml-rpc.el - 1.6.6 -

Re: [Emacsweblogs] Re: New xml-rpc.el and weblogger.el

2009-09-14 Thread Mark A. Hershberger
Leo sdl@gmail.com writes: I tried lisppaste.el from today emacswiki and the bug persists. This was tested with Emacs -q. I can't reproduce this at all. I've tried “emacs -q -no-site-file” with Emacs22 and Emacs23.1.50.1 (CVS). Here is a short test script that you can run from the command

Re: [Emacsweblogs] Re: New xml-rpc.el and weblogger.el

2009-09-14 Thread Mark A. Hershberger
Leo sdl@gmail.com writes: Thank you for this info. I realised it could be the fault of other libs used by xml-rpc and indeed the latest timezone.el is required for lisppaste to work, i.e., must have the change on Fri Aug 14 18:18:41 2009 UTC: add ability to understand ISO8601 basic format