Hi Neeme!
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Neeme Vool wrote:
>
>
> Yes, if you carefully read information after configuring php then there
> is a warning that if you intend to use php with some other module that
> uses mysql access, then don't rely on phps own mysql access and compile
> php with the orig
Hi Martin!
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, martin langhoff wrote:
[...]
> - BEGIN APACHE-HEAVY BUILD SEQUENCE--
[...]
Thanks a lot!
We will try it today... report follows
Regards
Ulrike
--
* NAMES: Ulrike ScheppJippii GmbH
*Software Development Departmen
> p.s. I don't want to bog down people's emailboxes with "useless"
> messages like this. And yet, I feel compelled to thank people when they
> have taken the time and trouble to help. Etiquette - do I reply to the
> list to make the thanks "public", or just to the person concerned?
> Thoughts? TIA
>OUT
>
>This filehandle is tied to Embperl's output stream.
>Printing to it has the same effect as using the [+ ... +]
>block.
>
> but if $escmode = 0, no input processing is done at all on data
> printed through OUT..
>
> (similarly when $escmode = 3, but you escap
Hi,
which versions of Perl/Apache/mod_perl/Embperl you are using? RPMs or
compiled from the source? Is mod_perl loaded as DSO or staticly linked into
Apache?
Maybe it help loading DBI and DBD::mysql at Server startup time (you should
do this with Embperl anyway) e.g. in your httpd.conf
PerlModu
Steve Wilder wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> I've done this several times on other servers without any problems, but
> for some reason, I can't get any Perl-DBI script to talk to my MySQL
> database when Apache is involved. Command line, it works fine, but
> mod_perl/Embperl stuff causes a segmentat
OUT
This filehandle is tied to Embperl's output stream.
Printing to it has the same effect as using the [+ ... +]
block.
but if $escmode = 0, no input processing is done at all on data
printed through OUT..
(similarly when $escmode = 3, but you escape html characters
Hi all.
I've done this several times on other servers without any problems, but
for some reason, I can't get any Perl-DBI script to talk to my MySQL
database when Apache is involved. Command line, it works fine, but
mod_perl/Embperl stuff causes a segmentation fault. It seems like as soon
Gerald Richter wrote:
> I think including/"executing" plain html files, without interpreting them,
> in the way you describe it, is really usefull and I already have planed to
> implement it, but not in 1.3. It's on my roadmap for 2.0b2. Embperl 2.0 will
> be much more flexible, by the possibility
>
> As I said before, I can see EmbperlObject being useful in a dual sense -
> both as an interpreter of embedded Perl code, and as a "construction
> engine" for OO websites through the EMBPERL_OBJECT_BASE functionality.
>
> JMHO, I'd be interested to see what Gerald thinks of all this (more
> wor
Hi,
>
>
> I understand! ;-) But i didn't find about this feature in doc. May be i
have
> bad found?
http://perl.apache.org/embperl/Embperl.pod.4.html#HTML_Tags
look at the A tag
> I use the Embperl of version 1.2.1
>
The hashref thing has been introduced in 1.3b4 or 1.3b5
Gerald
--
Hi,
>This looks like you are using an older Embperl version. Either upgrade
>Embperl or write it as an array ref (older Embperl versions only supports
>arrayref and _not_ hashrefs)
>
>to register
^^^ This is working! Thank you!
>This will convert the %fdat hash, to an array and pass it's
Hi!
>
> No
> It doesn't work
> I have written:
>
> to register
>
> And i have in HTML:
> to register
>
This looks like you are using an older Embperl version. Either upgrade
Embperl or write it as an array ref (older Embperl versions only supports
arrayref and _not_ hashrefs)
to register
This w
Hi,
>
> May be my english is bad that i am not understood. But i don't need this
> that you have written.
>
> I ask about a behaviour the [$ hidden $]. I would like to want the [$
hidden
> $] for tags. That
> is the [$ hidden $] directive has to have a two form:
>
> 1. The printing: and etc...
>
Hi,
>> May be we don't understand both?
>> I need to pass hidden fields by GET request but through link! I want to
pass
>> it through Some text but not
>> through by clicked button in a [$
hidden
>> $]! How can i do it? I would like to do it like this: > href="/foo/some.epl?[+hidden+]"> but how i
> I would like to do it like this: href="/foo/some.epl?[+hidden+]"> but how i am thinking this will not
> work
>
or if you don't have set optRawInput you need to escape the \, so it looks
like
This should do what you need. Embperl will care about correct escaping
Gerald
P.S. This wo
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 04:43:50PM +0500, Aleksey Zvyagin wrote:
> >> IMHO it's not wise to put everything to the url. This could open some
> >> unwanted possibilities to badminded users. I always check forms data and
> >It can suggest ideas to them, but I can't see how it actually gives them
> >m
Hello all!
>> > Hello anybody and Gerald!
>> >
>> > I need the [$ hidden $] directive but this have to put hidden fields to
URL
>> > For example:
>> >
>> > Embperl text:
>> >
>> >
>> > But this directive will not work how i know...
>> > For this capability i should do like this:
>> > use URI;
>>
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 01:27:18PM +0200, Neeme Vool wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > Hello anybody and Gerald!
> >
> > I need the [$ hidden $] directive but this have to put hidden fields to URL
> > For example:
> >
> > Embperl text:
> >
> >
> > But this directive will not work how i know...
> > For this
> Hello anybody and Gerald!
>
> I need the [$ hidden $] directive but this have to put hidden fields to URL
> For example:
>
> Embperl text:
>
>
> But this directive will not work how i know...
> For this capability i should do like this:
> use URI;
>
> The forming a URI escaped list
> [- $es
Hello anybody and Gerald!
I need the [$ hidden $] directive but this have to put hidden fields to URL
For example:
Embperl text:
But this directive will not work how i know...
For this capability i should do like this:
use URI;
The forming a URI escaped list
[- $escmode = 0 -]
[- $escmode =
21 matches
Mail list logo
