Re: [- -] vs. (was: quick embed perl Q)

> this was probably discussed previously, but why wasn't an xml definition > not used ie: > ># perl code here > ?> > > I dunno... [- -] and [$ $] seemed a little wierd to me... i'm not on the > mailing list but if you have a response e-mail me directly... > > otherwise, this stuff looks pret

Re: Solaris and Embperl

Hi, > The newest beta version of EmbPerl 2.0.7 seems > I guess you mean 2.0b1 ? > to have major testing problems when I tried to install it. > > Also, both of my installs failed miserably when using > > Solaris cc vs. Gnu gcc. > > Lastly, the default parameter for module/loadable code -KPIC >

quick embed perl Q

this was probably discussed previously, but why wasn't an xml definition not used ie: I dunno... [- -] and [$ $] seemed a little wierd to me... i'm not on the mailing list but if you have a response e-mail me directly... otherwise, this stuff looks pretty cool! -- Shayne http://www.shaynekas

Solaris and Embperl

The newest beta version of EmbPerl 2.0.7 seems to have major testing problems when I tried to install it. Also, both of my installs failed miserably when using Solaris cc vs. Gnu gcc. Lastly, the default parameter for module/loadable code -KPIC seems less portable than the -fPIC I've seen on