On 17-Apr-2002 Ed Grimm wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Wim Kerkhoff wrote:
>
>> In a nutshell, create a hidden layer. In that hidden layer, do a
>> GET/POST to a embperl/mod_perl page. The request will get sent to the
>> hidden in-memory document, which can then be parsed back into javascript
>>
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Wim Kerkhoff wrote:
> In a nutshell, create a hidden layer. In that hidden layer, do a
> GET/POST to a embperl/mod_perl page. The request will get sent to the
> hidden in-memory document, which can then be parsed back into javascript
> variables.
That's a security hole! I d
On 16-Apr-2002 Kee Hinckley wrote:
> At 3:19 PM -0700 4/16/02, Wim Kerkhoff wrote:
>>Where does one start? Are there any installers for other CGI
>>projects that can
>>be imitated?
>
> I don't know what's out there for CGI-type installations.
> I'd think the first thing would be to see if can
At 3:19 PM -0700 4/16/02, Wim Kerkhoff wrote:
>Where does one start? Are there any installers for other CGI
>projects that can
>be imitated? I started writing an installer for acmemail [1] in the style of
I don't know what's out there for CGI-type installations.
I'd think the first thing would
On 16-Apr-2002 Kee Hinckley wrote:
> At 2:23 PM -0700 4/16/02, Wim Kerkhoff wrote:
>
> You should always be doing validation on the back-end as well, if
> only to defend against malcious users.
That goes without saying... protection against both malicious and brain
dead users.
>>I found Embp
At 2:23 PM -0700 4/16/02, Wim Kerkhoff wrote:
>With JavaScript form validation, it's pretty easy to allow browsers with no JS
>support, or JS turned off, to still be able to submit the form without writing
>extra code. The JS code just gets ignored. However, with the XML-RPC idea,
You should alwa
On 16-Apr-2002 Cameron McBride wrote:
>> If a Javascript enabled browser is already a requirement, it's a great way
>> of
>> turning a browser from a stateless machine into a stateful one. For example,
>
> You have a very good point here, but is it a realistic one? (stateful
> thing) Almost eve
On 16-Apr-2002 Kee Hinckley wrote:
> At 3:43 AM -0700 4/16/02, Wim Kerkhoff wrote:
>>If a Javascript enabled browser is already a requirement, it's a great way of
>
> You mean, "If a browser supporting layers is already requirement".
> And of course you need to check it against
> Netscape/Moz
At 3:43 AM -0700 4/16/02, Wim Kerkhoff wrote:
>If a Javascript enabled browser is already a requirement, it's a great way of
You mean, "If a browser supporting layers is already requirement".
And of course you need to check it against
Netscape/Mozilla/IEWin/IEMac/Opera/
Mind you, I don't
> If a Javascript enabled browser is already a requirement, it's a great way of
> turning a browser from a stateless machine into a stateful one. For example,
You have a very good point here, but is it a realistic one? (stateful
thing) Almost every time I have played with things in Javascript --
On 16-Apr-2002 Cameron McBride wrote:
>> In a nutshell, create a hidden layer. In that hidden layer, do a
>> GET/POST to a embperl/mod_perl page. The request will get sent to the
>> hidden in-memory document, which can then be parsed back into javascript
>> variables.
>
> ooo, perhaps there migh
> In a nutshell, create a hidden layer. In that hidden layer, do a
> GET/POST to a embperl/mod_perl page. The request will get sent to the
> hidden in-memory document, which can then be parsed back into javascript
> variables.
ooo, perhaps there might be valid uses -- but this just feels 'dirty',
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 10:25:47AM +1000, Andrew O'Brien said:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 10:18:35AM +1000, Andrew Douglass wrote:
> > Can anyone tell me if it possible to pass a javascript variable to
> > embperl without using forms?
>
> No. :)
Yes. :-)
Have a look at: http://www.scottandrew.com
At 10:18 AM +1000 4/3/02, Andrew Douglass wrote:
>Can anyone tell me if it possible to pass a javascript variable to
>embperl without using forms?
In what sense? The JavaScript variable is only available in the
browser, it doesn't exist on the server at all. However JavaScript
could certainly
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 10:18:35AM +1000, Andrew Douglass wrote:
> Can anyone tell me if it possible to pass a javascript variable to
> embperl without using forms?
No. :)
javascript is completely client side while embperl is completely
server side. HTTP being a completely stateless protocol me
15 matches
Mail list logo
