Hello
This is second patch, one duplicated pin commented out(motion.motion-inpos)
motion_params_to_pins.patch
Description: Binary data
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell
joints_params_to_pins.patch
Description: Binary data
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword_
Alex, et al,
I am going to install a hard drive for the Atom board, so at this point I
can load any version of Linux. Is there a particular distro which is best
for building kernels? Debian Lenny instead of Ubuntu for example?
Thanks,
Eric
Remember they (Ubuntu) use their own source package, wh
Also, for atom (in order execution) it is necessary to have nicely
compiled code. Not sure how much the following helps, but you may want
to try it: "-O2 -fno-reorder-blocks -fno-reorder-functions"
Also, this is news to me :D "GCC 4.2 introduces a new -march option,
-march=native, which automatical
> I do want to make a deb package, both because I am not building on the
> machine with the Atom processor, and as noted above, at least one other
> person is using the same board and could use it.
>
> I suppose that may be a problem. The development machine has a genuine
> Core
> 2 duo processor,
Mario,
Thanks, I guess I will need to plug a hard drive into the Atom 330 system,
since the development machine is a core 2 duo. I did a lot of work shrinking
the Linux install on the Atom as small as possible (4GB flash drive), and
have not yet figured out how to take an image of it so I can put
Atom 330
32 bit profile (x86):
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-march=prescott -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"
CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"
MAKEOPTS="-j5"
64 bit profile (amd64):
CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-march=nocona -O2 -pipe"
CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"
MAKEOPTS="-j5"
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at
found it.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/110674/gcc-optimization-flags-for-intel-atom
And list of m_arch flags is here:
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Safe_Cflags/Intel#Atom_N270
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Eric H. Johnson
wrote:
> Alex,
>
>>> They are pretty ok, but it depends what you
Alex,
>> They are pretty ok, but it depends what you're after. <<
Just the easiest way for a kernel neophyte like me to get smp support for
the Intel Atom 330. I know jmk has the same board and the guilty party as
far as getting me started on this. :) I just want to see if I can tweak a
few more
I guess the P6 should be generic enough... I searched a lot but no
definite answer, other than the Atom uses SSE2, so "P6" should have
enough performance and compatibility with all architectures (the
default on many builds). These are important ((only?)) to make
performance optimisations for a spec
Mario,
>> Marion, <<
Oops, sorry, I work with a Marion and couldn't stop my fingers.
Sincere apologies.
Regards,
Eric
That is why I noted it in my post. I knew I was not supposed to use the
386/486... selection, but not sure of which one to use. Core2 seemed like
the only one that was close.
Marion,
That is why I noted it in my post. I knew I was not supposed to use the
386/486... selection, but not sure of which one to use. Core2 seemed like
the only one that was close. A Google search did find this post, which also
indicates to use the Core 2 entry:
http://fixunix.com/setup/532919-i
> Hi all,
>
> I saw the discussion on chat two nights ago about building an SMP kernel
> with rtai. I tried to give it a shot to use with the Intel Atom 330, and
> got
> to an error which I do not know how to resolve. I found these pages as
> references:
>
> http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/emcin
On Wednesday 28 January 2009, Eric H. Johnson wrote:
>
> I don't mean to step into a hornet's nest, and may well be my ignorance, as
> I have never made any attempt to learn Python or TK/TCL for example, but it
> seems to me that there is an awful lot of duplicated functionality across
> the vario
Atom is NOT "Core2" architecture!!! Atom is 45nm Silverthorne,
minimalistic, low-powered, low-performance CPU that has the lowest
common denominator of any parts needed in a CPU.
1.6GHz Atom has about the power of a Celeron 220 or less. You need to
pick a different, proper architecture first, Wikip
Hi all,
I saw the discussion on chat two nights ago about building an SMP kernel
with rtai. I tried to give it a shot to use with the Intel Atom 330, and got
to an error which I do not know how to resolve. I found these pages as
references:
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/emcinfo.pl?Debian_Lenny
16 matches
Mail list logo
