Re: [Emc-developers] More quirks with work offsets

2010-05-18 Thread Jon Elson
dave wrote: > > As for the rfl ... subroutines appear to be a real stumbling block. Life > is NEVER simple. > So, it is the subroutine, and not the use of G10 L20 and then G54, that causes the problem? Jon -- __

Re: [Emc-developers] More quirks with work offsets

2010-05-18 Thread Jon Elson
Neil Baylis wrote: > Maybe you could put the subroutine and the iteration in your > slot-generating program, and have it generate the linear g-code in a > single file. There is a way to run interactive programs from a script, where you call the interactive program, you specify how many lines bel

Re: [Emc-developers] More quirks with work offsets

2010-05-18 Thread dave
On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 12:30 -0500, Jon Elson wrote: > dave wrote: > >> > > Maybe this is a gentle hint to stay with linear programs. KISS > > has its advantages. > > I do a lot of work with a few lines of C to write G code. > > Yes it generates lots of lines but to my simple mind an easier way to

Re: [Emc-developers] More quirks with work offsets

2010-05-18 Thread Neil Baylis
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Jon Elson wrote: > > > To make it a linear program, I would have had to run the slot generator > program 24 times and type in the coordinates each time, then combine the > output of these 24 program runs into one file, editing out the M02's. > Manually typing in

Re: [Emc-developers] More quirks with work offsets

2010-05-18 Thread Jon Elson
Stephen Wille Padnos wrote: > My understanding of run from line is that it does execute the entire > program up to the selected line, simply not issuing NML commands for > motion or I/O (machine state). Yes, that WAS my understanding until this all came up! > Another point that I think Steve B qu

Re: [Emc-developers] More quirks with work offsets

2010-05-18 Thread Jon Elson
dave wrote: >> > Maybe this is a gentle hint to stay with linear programs. KISS > has its advantages. > I do a lot of work with a few lines of C to write G code. > Yes it generates lots of lines but to my simple mind an easier way to > go. ;-) > Well, but, but, splutter. I have all these

Re: [Emc-developers] More quirks with work offsets

2010-05-18 Thread Stephen Wille Padnos
dave wrote: > On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 20:42 -0500, Jon Elson wrote: > >> John Kasunich wrote: >> >>> The quirks are not with offsets. The problem is "run-from-line". >>> >>> It is evil. Don't do it. >>> >>> Sorry, just had to say that IMO RFL is only suitable for >>> very simple progr

Re: [Emc-developers] More quirks with work offsets

2010-05-18 Thread dave
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 20:42 -0500, Jon Elson wrote: > John Kasunich wrote: > > The quirks are not with offsets. The problem is "run-from-line". > > > > It is evil. Don't do it. > > > > Sorry, just had to say that IMO RFL is only suitable for > > very simple programs, I don't trust it to handl

[Emc-developers] OT: A career opportunity

2010-05-18 Thread John Prentice
Apologies for this OT post but there may be readers here who would welcome a change in "day job" while using all the skills we see deployed in EMC2. Engineering Position Available Tormach is looking for additional staff as we continue to expand and develop new products. This is a chance to jo