This is a simple driver written in comp for the Advantech pcl720 ISA
card as a result of a query on the forums. The card is in use in a
gang-router recently converted to EMC2. It seems sensible to make it
available to anyone else who might have the same card, even if it is a
bit ancient.
It is quit
This patch adds support for the Mesa 7i64 octuple servo driver, and
also generic support for other SPI devices.
It introduces a way for a sub-driver written in comp to interact with
the core Hostmot2 functions other than via pins for situations where
greater control and complexity is required.
I
On 08/09/2011 05:12 PM, Jeff Epler wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 04:01:49PM -0500, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
>> packaging: build-depend on the Hardy debhelper or newer
> Why? Do we depend on a feature not available in older debhelper now?
Our debian/compat file already says we require debhelp
Signed-off-by: Andy Pugh
---
src/Makefile |1 +
src/hal/drivers/mesa-hostmot2/bspi.c | 360 ++
src/hal/drivers/mesa-hostmot2/hostmot2.c | 33 +++
src/hal/drivers/mesa-hostmot2/hostmot2.h | 54 +-
src/hal/drivers/mesa-hostmot
Signed-off-by: Andy Pugh
---
src/hal/drivers/pcl720.comp | 141 +++
1 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 src/hal/drivers/pcl720.comp
diff --git a/src/hal/drivers/pcl720.comp b/src/hal/drivers/pcl720.comp
new file mode 100
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 04:01:49PM -0500, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> packaging: build-depend on the Hardy debhelper or newer
Why? Do we depend on a feature not available in older debhelper now?
Jeff
--
uberSVN's rich
We had someone in irc asking as well, I suggested he create something
like the plasma tool height comp but to compensate wear as he needed.
But it gets complicated at bends etc as the offset vector depends
where the material is. not trivial
Dave Caroline
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:57 PM, andy pugh
On 9 August 2011 16:06, Chris Radek wrote:
> They are way before any of that, back in the interpreter and canon
> level.
So, that is partly why a toolchange is a "queue-buster"?
--
atp
"Torque wrenches are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men"
--
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 03:57:31PM +0100, andy pugh wrote:
> Are tool-offsets applied in the TP, and "baked in" to the lookahead
> (such that real-time changes are not possible) or is it part of the
> kinematics area, such that it might be plausible to change them in
> real time?
They are way bef
Where in the grand scheme of things are tool offsets applied?
There have been two enquiries on the forum recently about adapting for
tool wear in real-time. One, I think, was using a die-grinder in a
milling style of machining, so needed adaptive tool-radius
compensation (Or, at least, he thought
Bugs item #3389036, was opened at 2011-08-09 10:12
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by cncdreamer
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=106744&aid=3389036&group_id=6744
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
11 matches
Mail list logo
