[Emc-developers] 2.5 Status

I have a patch (written by Pete) that adds support for three new Mesa FPGA cards. We have tested it on 2.5, and it works without breaking the support for the other cards. Is it OK for me to push it onto 2.5? -- atp "Torque wrenches are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men" --

Re: [Emc-developers] 2.5 Status

Seems fine to me if it doesnt break existing cards. - Reply message - From: "andy pugh" Date: Sun, Aug 28, 2011 06:37 Subject: [Emc-developers] 2.5 Status To: "EMC developers" I have a patch (written by Pete) that adds support for three new Mesa FPGA cards. We have tested it on 2.5, and

Re: [Emc-developers] [Emc-commit] v2.5_branch: Add support for Mesa 5i21, 5i25 and 4i69 FPGA cards.

Some feedback on this commit... I've not tested it at all, just read the patch. On 08/28/2011 10:36 AM, Peter C. Wallace wrote: > Add support for Mesa 5i21, 5i25 and 4i69 FPGA cards. > > Signed-off-by: Peter C. Wallace > > > http://git.linuxcnc.org/?p=emc2.git;a=commitdiff;h=9c81c5b > > --- >

[Emc-developers] doc bug?

When I go to , the title of the page looks messed up. It says: G Code Overview It looks like an anchor made it into the , when it belongs just in the . Any doc gurus know what's up with that? -- Sebastian Kuzminsky

Re: [Emc-developers] doc bug?

Thanks for pointing this out, Seb. I see that it also occurs in the chapter after that one, http://linuxcnc.org/docs/2.5/html/gcode/coordinates.html but not in the chapter before those two, or the chapter after. http://linuxcnc.org/docs/2.5/html/common/machining_center.html http://linuxcnc.org/doc

Re: [Emc-developers] doc bug?

On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 10:28:11PM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote: > When I go to , > the title of the page looks messed up. It says: > > G Code Overview > > It looks like an anchor made it into the , when it belongs just > in the