Bugs item #3438618, was opened at 2011-11-15 21:39
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by seb_kuzminsky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=106744&aid=3438618&group_id=6744
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of
Bugs item #3438611, was opened at 2011-11-15 20:58
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by seb_kuzminsky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=106744&aid=3438611&group_id=6744
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of
Jon Elson wrote:
> OK, great, good to know I can see the new docs SOMEWHERE!
> Oh, now a new problem! In the EMC2_HAL_Manual.pdf on the buildbot
OK, my fault, I messed up the formula and am now waiting for the
buildbot to
regenerate the file. The other formulas in other docs look great, as usual
Kent A. Reed wrote:
> Gentle persons:
>
> As I understand it, the problem with the use of latexmath is that it
> renders beautifully in the pdf format and is useless in the html format
> of the 2.5 docs. Is that a fair read of the problem?
>
>
I thought P Zamov said he had a fix that would all
Bugs item #3438609, was opened at 2011-11-15 20:50
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by seb_kuzminsky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=106744&aid=3438609&group_id=6744
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of
Gentle persons:
Apart from the figures and mathematical expressions, the most pressing
presentation issue I see with the current 2.5 docs concerns the links,
their targets, and the titles/captions/etc. presented to the user.
John already pointed out that the links in the body of the pdf docs
Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> Ah yes, I think you're right, some of the docs at linuxcnc.org/docs/2.5 are
> stale. There we have the following files:
>
>
> HAL User Manual (stale)
>
OK, great, good to know I can see the new docs SOMEWHERE!
Oh, now a new problem! In the EMC2_HAL_Manual.pdf on t
Gentle persons:
As I understand it, the problem with the use of latexmath is that it
renders beautifully in the pdf format and is useless in the html format
of the 2.5 docs. Is that a fair read of the problem?
There are currently just 47 instances of the 'latexmath:[' tag in the
English-source
Gentle persons:
I don't disagree with anything that was said in response to my first
message. I thought I had made it clear that I have no love for
bit-mapped graphics when I suggested png for now with a personal bias to
lean toward svg, where appropriate, in future and that I was not
suggesti
On Nov 15, 2011, at 10:23 , Jon Elson wrote:
> So, am I seeing stale cached copies, or are the hardware driver docs
> still missing from
> the PDFs? Somebody seemed to be saying they were now there, or maybe I
> was misinterpreting.
Ah yes, I think you're right, some of the docs at linuxcnc.or
Jon Elson wrote:
>
> Well, I see the 2.5 PDFs of the integrator's and developer's manuals
> have finally been
> regenerated on Nov 7. But, there's no sign of any of the hardware
> interface info in them.
> The asciidoc files are present in the src/docs/hal/drivers tree.
So, am I seeing stale cac
Pavel Shramov wrote:
> Including raster formats like png or gif into pdf give horrible result
> compared
> to vector ones. Also converting vector schemas to bitmap limits you in
> editing.
>
Right, we should probably pick one format for photographic and
illustrative images, like jpeg.
And, an
On 15 November 2011 11:15, Francis wrote:
> Inkscape is in the Ubuntu distribution. He manages .svg .dxf .eps etc.
> It is easy to use.
Google also found:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/dxf-svg-convert/
(and other, paid-for options
There is something very "Linux" about the positive review "After
Inkscape is in the Ubuntu distribution. He manages .svg .dxf .eps etc.
It is easy to use.
Francis
2011/11/15 Kim Kirwan
> Everything suggested looks good, except maybe one thing.
>
> I should point out that dxf may be the original source if the
> image (a line drawing) was created in QCAD or no
Everything suggested looks good, except maybe one thing.
I should point out that dxf may be the original source if the
image (a line drawing) was created in QCAD or now, LibreCAD.
(Or possibly even AutoCAD in some cases?)
So I wouldn't be in a hurry to get rid of dxf, in case it is
the origi
15 matches
Mail list logo
