On 1/17/2012 11:22 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
> I was just going to do some LinuxCNC renaming in the Wiki.
> I find the entire wiki seems to be set to read-only.
> Also, a number of pages seem to be missing.
> In Getting started:
> Supported Hardware, Installing Linux and LinuxCNC pure
> simulator are no
I was just going to do some LinuxCNC renaming in the Wiki.
I find the entire wiki seems to be set to read-only.
Also, a number of pages seem to be missing.
In Getting started:
Supported Hardware, Installing Linux and LinuxCNC pure
simulator are not active links.
In configuring LinuxCNC / Servo Spe
I've completely missed any discussion on the matter. Why is rebranding
"necessary"? Is there a FAQ/history that explains the rebranding? I
did a quick look and it was not in the obvious places (ie on
LinuxCNC.org's online documentation).
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:47:07 -0500, Steve Stallings wr
I concur that the change will appear somewhat
abrupt to those who do not follow things closely,
and will confuse many.
The re-branding to avoid the use of "EMC" and
"EMC2" may be necessary, but the obliteration
of "Enhanced Machine Controller" is not, in my
opinion, necessary or desirable at this
Gentle persons:
With Chris' announcement to the emc-users list concerning the agreement
between EMC Corp and the Board of Directors a practical question arises.
Chris' message says everything will be changed now, at v2.5.0.
Replacing instances of EMC and EMC2 on the website and wiki seems prett
Gentle persons:
While reviewing the V2.5 documentation I was struck by the variety of
ways we express copyright and license terms (or not, as the case may be).
The Copyright and Documentation License part of the EMC2 documentation
presumably covers all parts of the documents. Yet, individual co
hat is) on 20120117.
As in my last message, I list only the pages for which I have comments.
---
bldc.9 (man/man9/bldc.9.html)
bldc_hall3.9 (man/man9/bldc_hall3.9.html)
We've commented on these pages in separate emails.
---
classicladder.9 (man/man9/classicladder.9.html)
In "SEE ALSO&quo
Kent A. Reed wrote:
> ---
> Pico PPMC Driver (drivers/pico_ppmc.html)
>
> It's a minor nit, I know, but it seems to me the different Pico-board
> designators PPMC, USC. and UPC should be mentioned in the introductory
> paragraph since those acronyms show up repeatedly in the technical
> descript
Gentle persons:
I hadn't intended to review the man pages but several recent experiences
convinced me I should.
This message covers editorial issues I found reviewing on
http://www.linuxcnc.org/docs/2.5/ concerning the (English) "Commands and
userspace components" listed in index.html.
I will
Gentle persons:
This message covers editorial issues I found reviewing the HTML files on
http://www.linuxcnc.org/docs/2.5/ concerning the (English) Integrator
manual. I am picking up where I left off yesterday in Part A.
I read the parts on the morning (East Coast US morning, that is) of
2012/
Sam,
Thanks for clearing that up.
John
On 1/17/2012 8:01 AM, sam sokolik wrote:
> I am homing a locking rotary... It evokes the unlock sequence.
>
> sam
>
> On 1/17/2012 7:15 AM, andy pugh wrote:
>> On 17 January 2012 13:12, John Thornton wrote:
>>> A note on the original commit said that hom
I am homing a locking rotary... It evokes the unlock sequence.
sam
On 1/17/2012 7:15 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 17 January 2012 13:12, John Thornton wrote:
>> A note on the original commit said that homing didn't know how to unlock
>> and lock... I wonder if it does now?
> I guess that that coul
On 1/17/2012 3:53 AM, Alex Joni wrote:
> Jeff just fixed this:
> http://git.linuxcnc.org/gitweb?p=emc2.git;a=commitdiff;h=a0158d4
>
> Probably that's why the bldc was ok when you checked
>
>
Thanks, Andy, for pointing this out and Jeff for fixing it.
I was never a big fan of the roff/troff/nroff/
On 17 January 2012 13:12, John Thornton wrote:
> A note on the original commit said that homing didn't know how to unlock
> and lock... I wonder if it does now?
I guess that that could be handled in HAL?
--
atp
The idea that there is no such thing as objective truth is, quite simply, wrong.
--
A note on the original commit said that homing didn't know how to unlock
and lock... I wonder if it does now?
John
On 1/17/2012 7:03 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> LOCKING_INDEXER appears in
> http://www.linuxcnc.org/docview/2.5/html/config/ini_homing.html
> rather than where I expected, ie
> http://www
Working on that as we speak
John
On 1/17/2012 7:03 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> LOCKING_INDEXER appears in
> http://www.linuxcnc.org/docview/2.5/html/config/ini_homing.html
> rather than where I expected, ie
> http://www.linuxcnc.org/docview/2.5/html/config/ini_config.html
>
> I don't see any mention o
LOCKING_INDEXER appears in
http://www.linuxcnc.org/docview/2.5/html/config/ini_homing.html
rather than where I expected, ie
http://www.linuxcnc.org/docview/2.5/html/config/ini_config.html
I don't see any mention of the related pins here:
http://www.linuxcnc.org/docview/2.5/html/config/emc2hal.html
On 17 January 2012 10:35, chan wrote:
> I tried a toshiba satellite 3005-s403 laptop on ubuntu 10.04 the rtai
> does not load with a apic simulation.
The 8.04 liveCD is uniprocessor, try booting from than and running the
latency test. You might find that the laptop is not a good EMC2
candidate a
Hi
I tried a toshiba satellite 3005-s403 laptop on ubuntu 10.04 the rtai
does not load with a apic simulation.
Is it possible to rebuild a uni-processor kernel to make it work?
Any experience on these hardware?
Or there will be hopeless for that laptop, with your experience, I don't
have to put
Hi this is the new working patch for/From the Git
it is recomendet to load the 9Axis simulation for Testing this
ngc file in the patch
Sammel Lothar
Germany
>From 3d2d8d5fc86323416a82e682a2e4a04e324ea8b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sammel Lothar
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:16:03 +0100
Subject:
>
> While I have momentarily screwed up my V2.5 branch and toolchain both,
> just on a lark I tried searching my file siystem for files of the form
> grohtml-.png. It turns out I have several hanging around from
> December 2011. The very first one appears to be from a build of
> man/man9/bldc.
21 matches
Mail list logo
