On 9/7/2012 1:35 PM, Michael Haberler wrote:
> Am 07.09.2012 um 18:32 schrieb Dave:
>
>> I've lost on where this is at now.
>>
>> I'd like to load up 12.04 LTS 32 bit and try this out.. should I wait?
>>
>> Is there any good reason to use the 64 bit version?64 bits seems to
>> cause more proble
Yes the emcrsh is renamed and linuxCNC who is installed, seem to leave my
request to open that nonexisting task in silence or is it any logfile somewhere?
linuxcncrsh runs just fine, haven't checked all functionality yet but it looks
good.
Now I need an engine with tcp-connectivity for synchro
Am 07.09.2012 um 18:32 schrieb Dave:
> I've lost on where this is at now.
>
> I'd like to load up 12.04 LTS 32 bit and try this out.. should I wait?
>
> Is there any good reason to use the 64 bit version?64 bits seems to
> cause more problems than benefits.
>
> I'm just going to run it on
I've lost on where this is at now.
I'd like to load up 12.04 LTS 32 bit and try this out.. should I wait?
Is there any good reason to use the 64 bit version?64 bits seems to
cause more problems than benefits.
I'm just going to run it on a Intel D525MW board.
Thanks,
Dave
On 9/6/2012 2:3
On 9/7/2012 7:36 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
> I have decided to tacitly ignore the "codifying rules might make no sense"
> suggestion below and written up a wiki page which gives rules for preparing a
> contribution.
>
> http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?PreparingContributions
>
> But the
I have decided to tacitly ignore the "codifying rules might make no sense"
suggestion below and written up a wiki page which gives rules for preparing a
contribution.
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?PreparingContributions
But then, of course the purpose isnt to break the "no rules" rul
Roger,
Which version of Linuxcnc are you using? Due to the rebranding of emc to
linuxcnc, that module was renamed linuxcncrsh in version 2.5. Prior versions
will still be emcrsh.
There needs to be a note to that effect in the wiki and anywhere else it
appears. Personally I do not see why it ne
