On Nov 21 2012 3:05 PM, John Morris wrote:
> Hi EBo,
>
> On 11/21/2012 01:51 PM, EBo wrote:
>> True. But one point that is in the compatibility list that you did
>> not
>> cover is:
>>
>> if LCNCv3 is (L)GPL2+, then it conveys with anything that is
>> (L)GPL3+
>
> Thanks for pointing this out.
Hi EBo,
On 11/21/2012 01:51 PM, EBo wrote:
> True. But one point that is in the compatibility list that you did not
> cover is:
>
> if LCNCv3 is (L)GPL2+, then it conveys with anything that is (L)GPL3+
Thanks for pointing this out. I'm weak on this subject, only knowing
what I do from packagin
On Wednesday 21 November 2012 16:14:24 Michael Haberler did opine:
> Bas,
>
> Am 21.11.2012 um 18:49 schrieb Bas Laarhoven:
> > On 20-11-2012 20:54, Michael Haberler wrote:
> >> I dont want to curb your hopes too much, but I said 'GladeVCP+HAL
> >> standalone applications' and meant to say 'HAL o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/21/2012 11:49 AM, Bas Laarhoven wrote:
> On 20-11-2012 20:54, Michael Haberler wrote:
>> I dont want to curb your hopes too much, but I said
>> 'GladeVCP+HAL standalone applications' and meant to say 'HAL
>> only' - i.e. no Gcode, no task, no mot
True. But one point that is in the compatibility list that you did not
cover is:
if LCNCv3 is (L)GPL2+, then it conveys with anything that is (L)GPL3+
How much of readline do you really use? Can it be easily replaced with
something else.
What I am getting at is to start with *if* all develop
Hi list,
On 11/21/2012 07:11 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
> Yes it is time, but we have not ticked off on a key sanitary non-code
> prerequisites
>
> The GPL2-only situation prevents bringing in outside code which
> requires GPL2+ licenses.
>
> I table this issue again to get this finally resolved,
Bas,
Am 21.11.2012 um 18:49 schrieb Bas Laarhoven:
> On 20-11-2012 20:54, Michael Haberler wrote:
>> I dont want to curb your hopes too much, but I said 'GladeVCP+HAL standalone
>> applications' and meant to say 'HAL only' - i.e. no Gcode, no task, no
>> motion - more loudly
>>
>> that works
On 20-11-2012 20:54, Michael Haberler wrote:
> I dont want to curb your hopes too much, but I said 'GladeVCP+HAL standalone
> applications' and meant to say 'HAL only' - i.e. no Gcode, no task, no motion
> - more loudly
>
> that works and I can recommend looking into especially if the application
a (not perfect) hack for author list (src/hal directories):
$ cat find.sh
#!/bin/bash
mkdir /tmp/b 2>/dev/null
>|/tmp/b/all
cd /home/git/emc2-dev/src/hal
git checkout master
for f in `find . -iname '*.[ch]' -o -iname '*make*' `; do git blame $f
>>/tmp/b/all ; done
originator=kasunich
authors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/21/2012 8:51 AM, Kent A. Reed wrote:
> On 11/21/2012 8:09 AM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>> I don't mind. I would have sent to the dev list in the first
>> place, but I'm still figuring out what should/shouldn't be posted
>> to the list.
> Oh,
On 11/21/2012 8:17 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
> Am 21.11.2012 um 06:42 schrieb Anders Wallin:
>
>> On 11/20/2012 8:47 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
I just verified this combination works, for the standard Raspberry
Raspbian kernel 3.2.27+ with Posix threads (aka 'simulator'), and
with
On 11/21/2012 8:09 AM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> I don't mind. I would have sent to the dev list in the first place,
> but I'm still figuring out what should/shouldn't be posted to the list.
Oh, please! The reason you can't figure it out is we have no
rulesjust a sense that this is where
On Nov 21 2012 7:28 AM, John Kasunich wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012, at 09:18 AM, EBo wrote:
>> I'm not on the board, but my 2c is LGPL (most expansive possible
>> 0.1+)
>> all libraries, and GPL (0.1+) all high level interfaces. Them's my
>> 2c
>>
>> I would not suggest tabling the code writing
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012, at 09:18 AM, EBo wrote:
> I'm not on the board, but my 2c is LGPL (most expansive possible 0.1+)
> all libraries, and GPL (0.1+) all high level interfaces. Them's my 2c
>
> I would not suggest tabling the code writing, but you are correct --
> the licensing issue needs t
I'm not on the board, but my 2c is LGPL (most expansive possible 0.1+)
all libraries, and GPL (0.1+) all high level interfaces. Them's my 2c
I would not suggest tabling the code writing, but you are correct --
the licensing issue needs to be addresed, and frankly I thought it had
been addresse
Am 21.11.2012 um 06:42 schrieb Anders Wallin:
> On 11/20/2012 8:47 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
>>> I just verified this combination works, for the standard Raspberry
>>> Raspbian kernel 3.2.27+ with Posix threads (aka 'simulator'), and
>>> with Xenomai 3.2.21 for somewhat better performance
>>
>
Ebo,
Am 21.11.2012 um 10:56 schrieb EBo:
> It looks like it is time to start throwing together some breakout code
> in experimental repositories (github or bitbucket maybe) for L3. What I
> am talking about is sketches which are intended to be thrown away later
> and used to inform the new ve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/21/2012 6:45 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
> Hi Charles,
>
> I am delighted to see this great progress, and I am very eager to
> see the first PCI card to work with usermode threads - once one of
> them works, it should be mechanical work to get t
Hi Charles,
I am delighted to see this great progress, and I am very eager to see the first
PCI card to work with usermode threads - once one of them works, it should be
mechanical work to get the rest to work! In particular I'm itching for the
Mesanet drivers because I'm curious if an attempt
It looks like it is time to start throwing together some breakout code
in experimental repositories (github or bitbucket maybe) for L3. What I
am talking about is sketches which are intended to be thrown away later
and used to inform the new version 3 design.
On Nov 20 2012 12:54 PM, Michael H
20 matches
Mail list logo
