Re: [Emc-developers] recovery of ancient EMC1 source

On Jun 25 2013 7:50 PM, Jon Elson wrote: > Gene Heskett wrote: >> Perhaps a silly Q, but where in this history timeline does Ray Henry >> fit >> in? FWIW, Ray cooks a mean pork chop on the shore side grill at his >> place. >> > I think Ray's contributions are later than this, this package of >

Re: [Emc-developers] recovery of ancient EMC1 source

I am unaware of any issues with Ray's code. I think he came up partly as a result of us seeing each other in Wichita. He was the first introduction many of us had to EMC. For probably a decade he was the unofficial EMC "evangelist", and probably introduced it to more people then any other indi

Re: [Emc-developers] recovery of ancient EMC1 source

I was going to say that I would have been very surprised if he was a problem child, but I do not keep up with things. Glad to hear that there is no issues there. Also glad that he is still around ;-) On Jun 26 2013 7:32 AM, John Kasunich wrote: > I am unaware of any issues with Ray's code. I

Re: [Emc-developers] recovery of ancient EMC1 source

On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 04:44:52 -0600 EBo wrote: > out of curiosity, why has Ray's name come up? Is he one of the > people who will not consider relicensing so we can get it straight? > I thought the only real problem child was Paul. I think it's just plain curiosity. I'm sure Ray will be fine wit

[Emc-developers] Wichita "white papers"

During last week, there were several discussions about LCNC at a block level; both how it is today and what could be tomorrow. For those interested in a copy of the resulting diagrams, some pics I took of the diagrams can be found here: http://www.calypsoventures.com/privatedl/LCNC/LCNC_2013_Wh

Re: [Emc-developers] recovery of ancient EMC1 source

On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 04:44 -0600, EBo wrote: > On Jun 25 2013 7:50 PM, Jon Elson wrote: > > Gene Heskett wrote: > >> Perhaps a silly Q, but where in this history timeline does Ray Henry > >> fit > >> in? FWIW, Ray cooks a mean pork chop on the shore side grill at his > >> place. > >> > > I thin

Re: [Emc-developers] recovery of ancient EMC1 source

I talk to Ray fairly often. He is working 5-6 days a week, has put Maxine to work also and is hiring more people as the business expands. He claims he is not making any money but that depends on the viewpoint, (they are still paying off the loan that bought the business). My guess is that he is h

Re: [Emc-developers] recovery of ancient EMC1 source

On Jun 26 2013 10:31 AM, dave wrote: > On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 04:44 -0600, EBo wrote: >> On Jun 25 2013 7:50 PM, Jon Elson wrote: >> > Gene Heskett wrote: >> >> Perhaps a silly Q, but where in this history timeline does Ray >> Henry >> >> fit >> >> in? FWIW, Ray cooks a mean pork chop on the shore

Re: [Emc-developers] Vote Seb for 2.6 Release Manager!

On 6/25/13 07:16 , EBo wrote: > On Jun 25 2013 5:44 AM, Matt Shaver wrote: >> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:16:23 -0600 >> EBo wrote: >>> Best of luck to you Seb! >> >> Ditto. > > I think at this point we should ask does anyone object? If not, I > think the I's have it (but I was not there and there mig

Re: [Emc-developers] recovery of ancient EMC1 source

On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 10:46 -0600, EBo wrote: > On Jun 26 2013 10:31 AM, dave wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 04:44 -0600, EBo wrote: > >> On Jun 25 2013 7:50 PM, Jon Elson wrote: > >> > Gene Heskett wrote: > >> >> Perhaps a silly Q, but where in this history timeline does Ray > >> Henry > >> >>

Re: [Emc-developers] recovery of ancient EMC1 source

On Wednesday 26 June 2013 13:17:48 EBo did opine: > On Jun 25 2013 7:50 PM, Jon Elson wrote: > > Gene Heskett wrote: > >> Perhaps a silly Q, but where in this history timeline does Ray Henry > >> fit > >> in? FWIW, Ray cooks a mean pork chop on the shore side grill at his > >> place. > > > > I t

Re: [Emc-developers] recovery of ancient EMC1 source

On Wednesday 26 June 2013 13:31:42 Matt Shaver did opine: > On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 04:44:52 -0600 > > EBo wrote: > > out of curiosity, why has Ray's name come up? Is he one of the > > people who will not consider relicensing so we can get it straight? > > I thought the only real problem child was

Re: [Emc-developers] recovery of ancient EMC1 source

On Wednesday 26 June 2013 13:54:35 John Kasunich did opine: > I am unaware of any issues with Ray's code. I think he > came up partly as a result of us seeing each other in > Wichita. He was the first introduction many of us had > to EMC. For probably a decade he was the unofficial > EMC "evang

Re: [Emc-developers] recovery of ancient EMC1 source

On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 13:29 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Wednesday 26 June 2013 13:17:48 EBo did opine: > > > On Jun 25 2013 7:50 PM, Jon Elson wrote: > > > Gene Heskett wrote: > > >> Perhaps a silly Q, but where in this history timeline does Ray Henry > > >> fit > > >> in? FWIW, Ray cooks a m

Re: [Emc-developers] recovery of ancient EMC1 source

On 06/25/2013 12:08 AM, Jon Elson wrote: > Well, I fired up my old CNC control computer, and was > able to dump all the Linux and EMC tgz files off it > with no trouble. So, I have four EMC files > straight from NIST, from March 24 1999 to > 7 June 2000. A quick scan seems to show that > all the

Re: [Emc-developers] recovery of ancient EMC1 source

On Jun 26 2013 12:08 PM, dave wrote: > On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 13:29 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: >> On Wednesday 26 June 2013 13:17:48 EBo did opine: >> >> > On Jun 25 2013 7:50 PM, Jon Elson wrote: >> > > Gene Heskett wrote: >> > >> Perhaps a silly Q, but where in this history timeline does Ray >> H

Re: [Emc-developers] recovery of ancient EMC1 source

On Wednesday 26 June 2013 14:30:40 dave did opine: > On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 13:29 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Wednesday 26 June 2013 13:17:48 EBo did opine: > > > On Jun 25 2013 7:50 PM, Jon Elson wrote: > > > > Gene Heskett wrote: > > > >> Perhaps a silly Q, but where in this history timelin

Re: [Emc-developers] recovery of ancient EMC1 source

On 06/26/2013 01:12 PM, John Morris wrote: > Matt & I talked over the phone some months back about relicensing, and > to kick things off I sucked the sourceforge.net CVS trees into a set of > git repos. All EMC history seems to be in there, including commits > going back to EMC's early development

[Emc-developers] Did I leave...

My function generator in Wichita? -- atp If you can't fix it, you don't own it. http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev

Re: [Emc-developers] recovery of ancient EMC1 source

On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:16:51 -0500 John Morris wrote: > On 06/26/2013 01:12 PM, John Morris wrote: > Sounds like these are the git repos to go with. This is really good! Anything that is a pull from Sourceforge is covered by this. I guess the only source I need to look at preserving is stuff tha

Re: [Emc-developers] Did I leave...

I remember handing it back to you... sam On 06/26/2013 05:33 PM, andy pugh wrote: > My function generator in Wichita? > -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows

Re: [Emc-developers] Did I leave...

On 26 June 2013 23:42, sam sokolik wrote: > I remember handing it back to you... I just found it in with the DN2800 motherboard :-) -- atp If you can't fix it, you don't own it. http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto -- This

Re: [Emc-developers] Did I leave...

On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 23:58 +0100, andy pugh wrote: > On 26 June 2013 23:42, sam sokolik wrote: > > I remember handing it back to you... > > I just found it in with the DN2800 motherboard :-) > Well that is good, it is a long swim back to get it. ;-) Dave

Re: [Emc-developers] recovery of ancient EMC1 source

> On Jun 26 2013 10:31 AM, dave wrote: > >>> >> I could be completely off ... but I think PC may have had some >> involvement in mini. >> > > OOPS!!! You are absolutely right! Just look up the source, it says ### # Descripti

Re: [Emc-developers] recovery of ancient EMC1 source

On Jun 26 2013 8:13 PM, Jon Elson wrote: >> On Jun 26 2013 10:31 AM, dave wrote: >> >>> I could be completely off ... but I think PC may have had some >>> involvement in mini. >> > ... > > Is GPL V2 good enough? > See > >